Survey of 154 scholars places 45th president behind even ‘historically calamitous chief executives’ linked to civil war

Donald Trump finished 45th and rock bottom of a list ranking US presidents by greatness, trailing even “historically calamitous chief executives” who failed to stop the civil war or botched its aftermath.

Worse for the likely Republican nominee this year, his probable opponent, Joe Biden, debuted at No 14.

“Biden’s most important achievements may be that he rescued the presidency from Trump, resumed a more traditional style of presidential leadership and is gearing up to keep the office out of his predecessor’s hands this fall,” Justin Vaughn and Brandon Rottinghaus, the political scientists behind the survey, wrote in the Los Angeles Times.

    • frezik
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      OK. Now we get directly involved and Russia goes nuclear, or we don’t get involved at all and Russia takes over Ukraine.

        • frezik
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          You offering something better? Because I’m not seeing it.

          • FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            FIght your own fight. This war by proxy shit is bunk. If he’s bad enough to stop, then let’s go fucking stop him. If he’s not then why waste our money and their lives? It could be over tomorrow if we really wanted it to be, but we’ll just string it along, drag it out. Fuel the war machine.

            • frezik
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Because they’d go nuclear. We covered this.

              • FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                you don’t know that. and by being the first country to “go nuclear” they’d be putting a HUGE target on their backs. no way that would happen.

                • frezik
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Ok, it makes things more likely to go nuclear. Now that’s that settled, this is a bad idea, right?