• Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You don’t want health care, social security or education?

      You think that right now your taxes are only paying for things you want?

      You’d rather pay $33000 for an emergency appendectomy you had no preparation for than $4000?

      • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        You don’t want health care, social security or education?

        Not to the extent that I would be paying in taxes under a socialized system, no.

        You think that right now your taxes are only paying for things you want?

        Lack of perfection is not an excuse for not pursuing improvement.

        • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Implying you would rather pay an extra 30k for a surgery.

          There’s no “extent”. You get the same or better services(France is ranked 7th in healthcare, US is 30th worldwide), but far cheaper.

          https://ceoworld.biz/2021/04/27/revealed-countries-with-the-best-health-care-systems-2021/

          Lack of perfection blah blah…

          Thank you, this is my point: Other countries are doing healthcare and education better than the US, cheaper for everyone, with less bureaucracy and better results.

          • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Implying you would rather pay an extra 30k for a surgery.

            Absolutely, considering the absolutely gargantuan savings over time.

            Other countries are doing healthcare and education better than the US, cheaper for everyone

            It’s hardly cheaper, unless you’re the type to just pretend taxes don’t count

            • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The gargantuan savings of paying 10 times as much for any medical, dental, vision or internal medical diagnosis or procedure?

              Yale epidemiologists(and every other research scientist) prove that socialized medicine is cheaper:

              https://www.citizen.org/news/fact-check-medicare-for-all-would-save-the-u-s-trillions-public-option-would-leave-millions-uninsured-not-garner-savings/

              The US would save almost half a trillion a year by switching to Medicare for all.

              It’s absolutely cheaper, unless you’re pretending that taxes are your only expense.

              Want to get a be a doctor in the US? 50k to 60k. vs. public education, 1k-4k a year.

              Just by going to school in the US, you are crippling yourself financially. Chronic illness? Financially crippling. Car crash injuries? Root canal?

              French socialized medicine? A nominal fee for far better healthcare.

              Saving a few thousand a year does not offset the tens of thousands of dollars US college students pay every semeste, nor devastating medical debt for anyone with common illnesses, nor millions list in crumbling transportation infrastructure, nor the paltry social security that seniors cannot live on, nor the complete lack of combat veteran support for medical care or housing. Three thousand a year does not cover a fraction of any of these costs in the for-profit US systems.

              Ever maintain your car? What is more cost-effective? Changing the fluids and filters annually or buying a new car annually?

              The savings are mathematical fact proved for decades by every country using socialized services.

              • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                Ever maintain your car? What is more cost-effective? Changing the fluids and filters annually or buying a new car annually?

                What’s cheaper is not spending my money on a Mercedes for everyone on the block

                • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Mercedes - luxury brand that you pay more for and receive lower quality parts and service. That’s the healthcare system you already pay for.

                  But we can pretend they are a good brand for your sake.

                  The “Mercedes” in this case costs as much as a Toyota Corolla beside everyone chips in.

                  Veterans could also get a “Mercedes”. Your children, your relatives, could each get the “Mercedes”.

                  Your main argument for paying more money is that you don’t want to help people. You’re paying many times more money for similar or worse services for no reason other than to deprive others.

                  • goat@sh.itjust.worksM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Please stop arguing with cars 3:

                    just use healthcare dudes. It’s already present in both countries. no need to use analogies or metaphors. i ain’t gonna force either of you, but using these arguments isn’t going to get either of you anywhere productive.

                • goat@sh.itjust.worksM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Their argument was bad anyway.

                  You can’t compare healthcare to cars.

    • SimplyKnorax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sounds a lot like “it’s not my problem until it actually affects me personally”.

      I don’t know why people want to avoid paying as little taxes as possible when it basically improves the infrastructures/services in their own communities.

      • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sounds a lot like “it’s not my problem until it actually affects me personally”.

        That is, fundamentally, the definition of “my problem”. If I’m not effected, it isn’t my problem, simply by nature of not effecting me. Not exactly sure what point you’re trying to make with it.

        I don’t know why people want to avoid paying as little taxes as possible when it basically improves the infrastructures/services in their own communities

        Because I have little interest in community services and infrastructure.

        • epicsninja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          My man here has decided community services like The Fire Department and infrastructure like The Roads are not important to him.

        • Djeece@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean, when you consider the US government spends more (almost twice as much) on healthcare per capita than most countries with free healthcare, you’re literally paying more taxes for it AND you have to shell out 50k$ when something bad happens.

          Your only argument is “Taxes bad” even when we’re talking about a system that would actually cost less taxes, just because it has a side effect of also helping less fortunate people.

          How much more egocentric can you get lmao

          • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            you’re literally paying more taxes for it AND you have to shell out 50k$ when something bad happens

            And yet my taxes are significantly lower than if I were in any of the countries with socialized systems.

            • Djeece@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not unless you’re in like Arizona or Florida or other shit low-taxes states full of freedumb.

                • Djeece@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Nah what I’m saying is that most states’ taxation rates are pretty close to what you’d get in other developed countries.

                  Except pretty much every other developed country has cheap healthcare and education. The US is truly alone in this, and it shows, because the US also has some of the worst inequalities of the modern world.