• AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    I don’t know, we went hundreds of years without this being as significant of a problem. The first overtly significant thing in this vein I remember was when McConnell said they wouldn’t vote for anything that came out of Obama’s administration because it was more important to ensure he was a one term president than to actually pass any legislation.

    It had been getting bad before that for sure. Really, I think the bad times started when Republicans started courting evangelical christians as a way to grow their power (older folks will remember that Republicans used to be pro choice because they saw it as a government regulation issue, not a moral one). To do that, they went from saying Democrats were wrong to saying Democrats were evil. You can negotiate and compromise with someone you think is wrong, not someone you think is evil.

    But that stuff isn’t inherent in a two-party system. We had one for ages without that problem.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      the civil war did happen and the year it did was from a 3rd party being like “yeah the federal gov shouldn’t enforce the fugitive slaves act, but we shouldn’t ban slavery” I don’t think the US is necessarily facing slavery level of direness but we do need to decide whether we’re a modern country with a livable working class or a billionaire owned theocratic hellscape.

        • Fedizen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          no I dont, but its the issue at the heart of the modern US schizophrenia. It might seem insurmountable but there are only hundreds of billionaires.