nifty@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 7 个月前Every language has its nichelemmy.worldimagemessage-square149fedilinkarrow-up1949arrow-down143
arrow-up1906arrow-down1imageEvery language has its nichelemmy.worldnifty@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 7 个月前message-square149fedilink
minus-squareDroggelbecher@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up29arrow-down1·7 个月前I had to learn Fortran for my thesis because it’s the industry standard in particle physics
minus-squaregeogle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·7 个月前Physics changes with retirements. FORTRAN should received it’s gold watch and shown the door about 20 years ago now.
minus-squareDroggelbecher@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·7 个月前There’s no distinct generations of either physicists or codes that all retire at the same time
minus-squarepbbananaman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·7 个月前How long ago? ROOT (and other frameworks like GEANT) using C++ has been the standard for over 15 years, but probably longer. I think my advisor was of the last generation that had to write in Fortran.
minus-squareDroggelbecher@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·7 个月前Currently lmao. I’m using those tools as well but some specific event generators I’m using are in Fortran still
minus-squareCodex@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·7 个月前 the last generation to write FORTRAN runs to look out window My God is the sun turning into a red giant?! Oh no, whew, that’s a relief! Guess the FORTRAN programmers will be relevant for a little longer too then. (As a .NET dev, I wish some languages (or versions of languages) would die but i really think once code has been written it never goes away!)
minus-squareCosmic Cleric@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 个月前[COBOL has entered the chat.] Capitalism will never let a programming language die, if it’s still less expensive than an alternative.
minus-squareCosmic Cleric@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 个月前A lot of COBOL programs are still running to this day.
I had to learn Fortran for my thesis because it’s the industry standard in particle physics
Physics changes with retirements. FORTRAN should received it’s gold watch and shown the door about 20 years ago now.
There’s no distinct generations of either physicists or codes that all retire at the same time
deleted by creator
How long ago? ROOT (and other frameworks like GEANT) using C++ has been the standard for over 15 years, but probably longer. I think my advisor was of the last generation that had to write in Fortran.
Currently lmao. I’m using those tools as well but some specific event generators I’m using are in Fortran still
thank you for your service 🫡
runs to look out window
My God is the sun turning into a red giant?!
Oh no, whew, that’s a relief! Guess the FORTRAN programmers will be relevant for a little longer too then.
(As a .NET dev, I wish some languages (or versions of languages) would die but i really think once code has been written it never goes away!)
[COBOL has entered the chat.]
Capitalism will never let a programming language die, if it’s still less expensive than an alternative.
A lot of COBOL programs are still running to this day.