This new normal of near-constant wildfire smoke annoys me as much as the next person. But it serves as a reminder that we share one fragile atmosphere that we’re collectively screwing up. Fruitless to waste all this energy pointing fingers like children when we should be joining hands to fix this. It’s like nature’s warning signal.

Whether it be wildfire smoke, a global pandemic, or heat waves, nature know no geopolitical borders. So maybe instead of squabbling over whose smoke is whose, we could acknowledge that we’re all in this smoldering mess together. We only have one planet to live on, and we only have one atmosphere to breathe from.

(just food for thought)

  • Smk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Is this even true ? Is there anyone blaming Canada for this ?

  • AngryMulbear@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    We need to start taking forest management seriously in this country.

    Human development has disrupted the natural forest cycle, and putting out every fire that threatens us is only making things worse. Couple that with the unknown consequences of climate change going forward, we need to be far more proactive than reactive.

  • nbailey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Some people seem to think that you can rope off a “designated peeing area” in the swimming pool…

    We all share one climate – it doesn’t matter where in the world you burn the coal or where the fires break out, we all suffer together. That’s the reality that a lot of people all over the world don’t seem to be willing to understand.

  • 1chemistdown@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    The title of your post makes me think of the song…

    Blame Canada, blame Canada with their…

    My family to the north, hold strong. It sucks, and after spending several summers behind doors away from wildfire smoke, all I can say is stay safe and healthy. Our elders have failed the world and we’re paying for it.

  • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Wrong… Blame fossil fuel industry, blame the auto industry, blame tax cuts that result in the defunding of forestry management. and then most of all, blame ourselves for enabling all of the above

    THEN we can join hands and fix this

    • T0rrent01@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      You’re 100% right. But my point is, international cooperation is key, and every country has a part to play. As we’ve all seen during the COVID pandemic politicizing natural disasters is a recipe for disaster, and unfortunately, it appears as though we haven’t learnt a thing.

      • YarRe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        We have. Politicians who gobble fossil industry cock do not care. This is intentional and no amount of “learning” helps as long as oligarchs exist. Sorry.

        • juusukun@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          “politicizing disasters” to me just sounds like exploring the possibility that there are people and actions to blame…

          • HappyExodus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Disasters are kinda act of God. But doubling the odds (prob more like 10x) of having one is a human decision.

  • GrindingGears@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s actually a normal natural process that needs to happen. It’s the only way Lodgepole Pines regenerate for instance (their pods need heat to crack open to release seeds). This is actually a healthy thing, for the environment anyways. Fires aren’t bad, it’s the methods we use to intervene and plan, and our development planning that’s the real issue.

    • joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      The size of these fires aren’t good though.

      When people talk about fires being good for an ecosystem they are talking about smaller fires where afterwards biodiversity is able to recover. With individual fires as large as we’re having it takes a very long time for biodiversity to recover.

      • juusukun@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yup! I recently read about aboriginal tribes doing controlled burns during the winter, rainy seasons etc. They even noticed certain plants would grow more afterwards, attract certain animals etc

      • bluGill@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        while you are not wrong, there isn’t really anything else we can do. At this point the best thing to do - because it is the only thing feasible - is let the first burn, and then start over by doing the regular burns that forests need. We know from other fires that forests tend to recover a lot faster than you would expect and so in a decade we will have healthy forests again.

        Sure, if you can put in a large fire break across a province/state and burn just one side this year, and the other side next year that would be good. However both need to burn and there is no way to do just a small area every year and catch up to where the forests need to be.

    • Kbin_space_program@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      No, not like this.

      These fires we have now, and have had for the last few years, do have a historical event we can look back on, albeit with dread.

      The Permian Extinction. One of the characteristics of it was apparently forest fires on this scale.

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        The Permian extinction was caused by the basaltic flood eruptions that created the Siberian Traps, with a volume of four million cubic kilometers of lava. That’s not happening here.

    • HappyExodus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yes one or two wild fires every few years are part of natural process, but what going on RN is way out of scale and add to the already not natural pressure we put on forest regeneration.

      • AngryMulbear@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        We’ve been suppressing fires for decades, allowing underbrush to build up creating even worse conditions for fires.

        Either we let it burn, or make a conscious effort to clean up the underbrush ($$$). There is nothing we can do to reverse climate change fast enough to stop this.

    • 🐱TheCat@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think you’re right in a micro sense. People are probably downvoting you because this logic is generally an opening volley by climate change deniers to argue that everything that’s happening now is natural.

      A fire isn’t bad, giant fires that burn huge swathes of land because higher than normal temps have dried the land to tinder are kinda bad. And we need to recognize that the higher than normal temps are the result of fossil fuel burning at an insane rate (sorry for the reddit link, need someone to rehost this great graphic over here!)

  • mPony@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    They’re just jealous that we even still have trees that can burn. Sorry, Manhattan.

  • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    My province blamed the latest wildfires on offroad vehicles and as a result banned the use of any off-road vehicle.

    I’ve got an electric dirtbike that doesn’t even get warm anywhere and I was asked to dismount over this risk. Kinda silly if you ask me.

    • Darkonion@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      More nuanced rules would be good in some ways, but I think more nuanced rules would require a larger government and more expensive services to oversee, or even to make such rules. I would be in support of trying that, as I think the long term benefits will exist, but many are not as there is an increase in short term pain because we’d have to pay long before we’d see a benefit, and people would have to keep voting to be in pain before results are realized. Hard to sell.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Welcome to the dystopian future … where we argue and fight with one another and maybe even start at a war or two about why our planet is falling apart … rather than admitting we are all the problem and that we should do something about it.

    • T0rrent01@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      The massive overreaction and resistance to COVID mandates gives us a bitter taste of what’s to come. Like, if a certain segment of the population can’t even handle relaxing at home for a little while and wearing pieces of cloth, they’ll sure be in for a rough awakening once the severity of the climate situation necessitates measures like, I don’t know, vegetarian mandates due to meat shortages, outdoor or N95 mask mandates for all the smoke like we’re seeing now, or water rationing like what California has been doing for drought.

  • 1bluepixel@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Get ready for the blame game, because as climate change intensifies, that’s gonna happen over and over again. We’re leaving the “this may be real but is it man-made?” phase and entering the “okay, but it wasn’t MY fault” phase.

  • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    You know what? Whether or not these wildfires are a direct consequence of Canadian climate policy or not, Canada does not get nearly the blame it deserves for continually raping this planet and its people.