perishthethought@lemm.ee to tumblr@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agoThe problem with not votingfedia.ioimagemessage-square439fedilinkarrow-up11.49Karrow-down1102
arrow-up11.39Karrow-down1imageThe problem with not votingfedia.ioperishthethought@lemm.ee to tumblr@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square439fedilink
minus-squareTinidrillinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down5·9 months agoIn the US that would almost literally be voting in Republicans. They want the system to crawl to a halt, and critical functions are legislated to frequently sunset so they can hold the system hostage on a regular basis.
minus-squareErika2rsis@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down13·9 months agoThis is very superficial.
minus-squaredvoraqs@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·edit-29 months agoIt’s how the system works with First Past the Post voting. It doesn’t support more than 2 viable candidates. We need to reform our election system.
minus-squareTinidrillinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·9 months agoWell, it’s a short comment on a social media platform, what do you expect. At least it’s less superficial than “This is very superficial.”
minus-squareErika2rsis@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down10·9 months agoI should’ve gone into detail, but I’m just not in the mood to argue sometimes. I’ll get back to you if I do.
In the US that would almost literally be voting in Republicans. They want the system to crawl to a halt, and critical functions are legislated to frequently sunset so they can hold the system hostage on a regular basis.
This is very superficial.
It’s how the system works with First Past the Post voting. It doesn’t support more than 2 viable candidates. We need to reform our election system.
Well, it’s a short comment on a social media platform, what do you expect. At least it’s less superficial than “This is very superficial.”
I should’ve gone into detail, but I’m just not in the mood to argue sometimes. I’ll get back to you if I do.