• ShepherdPie
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    No it doesn’t. That data was seriously flawed and even had an added disclaimer from the company saying it is solely the author’s opinion.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Looks like they used the same data that they use to provide insurance quotes, and then the article got popular, and they didn’t want to fight pissed off car manufacturers, so they chucked a disclaimer on the article.

      • ShepherdPie
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        Using it to provide insurance quotes would be appropriate. Using it to determine which vehicles crash the most is not.

        Using their ‘formula,’ if I drive a Honda Civic and get rear-ended, insurance totals the car, and I use that money to go buy a Model 3, they will count me as a “Tesla crash statistic” because I’m getting a quote for a Tesla with an accident on my record. This is idiotic because A) I wasn’t driving a Tesla during the crash, and B) I wasn’t even at fault for the accident, yet they still count it as a Tesla crash.

        Not to mention other issues with the article like Pontiac, Saturn, and Oldsmobile being some of the “safest” cars on the road even though those companies built shitty cars and went out of business 10-15 years ago.

        The company put the disclaimer on the article because it’s junk data and misleading conclusions.