silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.net · edit-29 months agoEnergy efficiency of active travel (walking, cycling, ebike) compared to an electric carslrpnk.netimagemessage-square136fedilinkarrow-up1401arrow-down138file-textcross-posted to: fuckcars@lemmy.worldantiwork@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1363arrow-down1imageEnergy efficiency of active travel (walking, cycling, ebike) compared to an electric carslrpnk.netsilence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.net · edit-29 months agomessage-square136fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: fuckcars@lemmy.worldantiwork@lemmy.ml
minus-squareSonori@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·9 months agoIn this graph a bus would be a lot worse than a far given the massive size, aerodynamic brick wall, and constant stops.
minus-squareIsmay@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·9 months agoYeah but you have to divide the footprint by the average number of travelers.
minus-squareSonori@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 months agoWhich in non city environments with high frequency is often only a handful to a dozen at most. Not that it matters, as this graph doesn’t show or or try to compare per person, only calories per vehicle mile.
In this graph a bus would be a lot worse than a far given the massive size, aerodynamic brick wall, and constant stops.
Yeah but you have to divide the footprint by the average number of travelers.
Which in non city environments with high frequency is often only a handful to a dozen at most. Not that it matters, as this graph doesn’t show or or try to compare per person, only calories per vehicle mile.