At work we somehow landed on the topic of how many holes a human has, which then evolved into a heated discussion on the classic question of how many holes does a straw have.

I think it’s two, but some people are convinced that it’s one, which I just don’t understand. What are your thoughts?

  • SHITPOSTING_ACCOUNT@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    How many holes does a donut have?

    Now make the donut higher. A lot higher. Now you have a donut-tunnel. Now make the walls thinner. Now shrink it. Now you have a straw.

    One hole.

      • bicyclingdonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        That doesn’t change the topology though. Or at least you can’t without it no longer being a straw.

        A straw is the product of a circle and an interval. Either the knot doesn’t fully seal the interval, meaning it’s topology is maintained, or you completely seal the straw, changing it from 1 long interval to 2 separate intervals, changing the object entirely.

        In this situation, the straw would not be completely sealed. It is clearly inefficient, but technically there exists a path for which there is a level of force that could applied that would make the straw function.

    • deeply_moving_queef@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      This seems overly reductionist to the point where I could just as easily describe my mouth and my anus as the same hole.

      • CountZero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah, that’s a concept that gets covered extensively in anatomy, immunology, and microbiology. It’s called “the donut model”. This is not a joke. It clearly shows how your digestive system is exposed to the outside world, similar to skin. You can obviously see why this is important immunologically, since germs can just get into the mouth/butthole in a way that they can’t penetrate skin.

        It’s one long hole.

      • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        No, but that’s two holes. And it’s because the holes are not connect by a single, unbroken cylinder. It’s the material at the edge of those holes and the 90° turn at the corners that makes the holes disconnected.

        • blazerboy65@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          The edges and corners mean nothing for the purposes of counting holes. Counting holes is a concept of topology that relies on continuous deformation. All non-opening features of the object just get squished and stretched away in the process of identifying holes.

          For the purpose of counting holes a can with two openings punched into it is equivalent to a donut which we know has only one hole.

    • veganzombeh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I understand geometrically they have the same number of holes but in my head straws still have two holes because they have an “inside” so both entrances to the inside have to be a hole.

  • theherk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Classic topology question. Absolutely one hole; it goes all the way through.

    Of course, connotatively, two is a fine assessment, but not in topology.

    How many holes does a donut have? Now just try to image the real difference between a straw and a donut. Is there one, aside from deliciousness?

    • Klear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      That’s nice but topology is quite removed from everyday language. A hole in the ground is a hole.

      • theherk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I completely agree. That’s what I’m saying. Topologically if you dig into the earth with a shovel, it hasn’t changed at all; there is no hole, but connotatively there clearly is.

        • Klear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          And what I’m saying is that answering this with topology is quite misplaced because topology explicitly doesn’t deal with physical objects, ever. It uses very specific abstract definitions which cannot apply to everyday life.

          That is not to say it isn’t useful. It’s an amazing discipline with wide applications, but answering questions about the properties of physical objects is not its intended use.

          • theherk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            I was explicit that there are two topics here. You seem to agree. Why you think bringing up topology when asking a famous topology question that people like Riemann have been talking about for a few hundred years is just weird. That’s like saying you can’t talk about geometry when asking how many sides a house has. Feels very akshually.

  • Ddhuud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Mathematically It’s one. Think of a disk, like a CD, does it have one hole or two? One, right? Now imagine you can make it thicker, I.e. increase the height, and then reduce the outer radius… Making it progressively more straw-like. At what point does it stop having 1 hole and begin to have 2?

    Topologically they’re the same shape.

    I’m sure Matt Parker has a video on this topic in YouTube. Here

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    It has two exits, one hole.

    If you drill a hole in a block of wood you create one hole not two, note that whether or not the drill exits the opposite side, only one hole has been created despite differing numbers of exits.

  • juliebean@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    how many holes does a donut have? one. a straw is just a tall plastic donut.

    two holes… smdh… kids these days

      • bicyclingdonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Just copying my response to another comment asking the same:

        That doesn’t change the topology though. Or at least you can’t without it no longer being a straw.

        A straw is the product of a circle and an interval. Either the knot doesn’t fully seal the interval, meaning it’s topology is maintained, or you completely seal the straw, changing it from 1 long interval to 2 separate intervals, changing the object entirely.

        In this situation, the straw would not be completely sealed. It is clearly inefficient, but technically there exists a path for which there is a level of force that could applied that would make the straw function.

  • Girru00@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I thought one hole intuitively, then I started thinking… what about those y shaped straws or medical hoses that split… one hole? Two holes? Three?

  • Yarla98@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I believe the confusion lies in the word “holes” when you are thinking about openings or exits. Just my 2 cents.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yes, I agree. “Hole” is poorly defined. This isn’t a technical question about straws but a technical question about language.

      • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        That’s the gist of practically all philosophical thought experiments.

        When is a heap of sand no longer a heap? I dunno, define “heap” and there’s your answer. It’s not going to be a useful answer though because the rest of the world doesn’t define the word with enough precision for the question to be meaningful in the first place. There is no authority on Earth that can do that. You can define the problem in precise mathematical terms but then it will NOT be the same thing as a plain-English “heap” and you’d be pulling a fast one if you acted like it was.