• BertramDitore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Florida. The Sunshine State is Florida for those who don’t know, don’t care, or hate it when authors use nicknames for some proper nouns and actual names for other things in the same category.

    It’s petty, I know, but just use the words we all know for fuck’s sake.

    Edit: I’m not calling out the OP (thanks for sharing this!), these words that bother me appear in the text of the study.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        They’re the Lone Star state, since they’re the only state with a standing legal option to split into five separate states whenever they want.

        Lots of logical state nicknames out there.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Its cause they think they were the only state that was independent from the US before becoming a part of it, ya know ignoring Vermont, California, and fucking Hawaii which wasnt just independent it was a whole ass kingdom and nation state.

    • TIMMAY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I thought florida was, much to the amusement and dismay of people with brains in their heads, as the “education state” now?

      also doesnt arizona get more sunshine than any other state or something like that?

      State nicknames are stupid. IL is “land of lincoln” but he was born in kentucky 🤦‍♂️

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Plotting anything by absolute numbers instead of per capita basically gives you a population map.

    • Omega@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      To be fair, I hate full 2 lane roundabouts. The right lane should be for immediate turn-offs only. Luckily the roundabouts in my area are made so the right lane splits off and only go to the next turn-off.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Right lane for the first or second exits. Left lane for the second or third exit (or reverse direction). Works great, I used to drive through a big one on a highway and a little one in the main intersection in town all the time.

        • Omega@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Oh, I fully understand. But if you getting on in the right lane going to the second exit, and some other car was ALREADY on in the second lane, there’s no way to know if you need to give right of way or if they’re about to continue to the next exit. Should I be breaking or not? Is this car about to veer in front of me?

          It’s just much simpler if right lane was first exit only.

          • prole@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Turn signals are meant to take care of that… Seems like your issue is with other drivers, not the roundabout itself.

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Traffic entering the roundabout yields to all traffic already in the roundabout.

            • prole@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              I frequent a roundabout that bucks this rule, and it drives me nuts. Because the roundabout is part of a relatively major throughfare, people who are already in the circle need to yield to those who are entering from that one particular road. So as to not make the people on the major road slow down too much I guess?

              It makes sense when you think about it, and It works OK if you’re familiar with the circle, but if you’ve never driven on it before and you miss the internal yield sign (or if you’re entering from the major road and don’t see the lack of yield sign), then you’re going to cause issues.

            • Omega@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              I’m talking about after you’re already in the roundabout. When the right lane’s first and second exit matches the left lane’s second and third exit and thr right lane doesn’t know if the left lane is exiting or not.

              • catloaf@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Yeah, that can be a bit tricky, but in my experience people use their signals and drive defensively to allow people to exit. And because entering traffic yields to both lanes, there aren’t so many cars in the roundabout at the same time that it becomes a problem.

    • reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Roundabouts weren’t taught or tested for in the US when people over 50 originally learned to drive. It’s not surprising they don’t know how to deal with them.

      • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s an incredibly simple concept, though

        I wasn’t taught about them in drivers ed either, but the first time I saw one it was quite clear what to do

    • Misconduct@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s almost like just plopping them into places with people that have never even seen them isn’t a great idea. My city randomly has a couple in busy spots and it’s always a shitshow with people coming across them unexpectedly. They did nothing to prepare people for dealing with them they just built them in 🙄

      • Soggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Roundabouts are on the driving test, and people are expected to keep up with changes in local law. Do a tiny bit of due diligence and don’t blame the people building objectively safer intersections.

        • Misconduct@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          They are not in the driving test even now in my city lol. Even if they were, we renew our licenses every like 50 years it’s ridiculous. The four roundabouts placed randomly around town are legit just hazards because people don’t know wtf they’re doing

          Talking about due diligence when you don’t even know where I’m from and couldn’t even possibly know this about every city 🙄

        • Misconduct@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I think y’all have shown that you lack reading comprehension and desperately need to feel superior but ok. Honestly lemmy users are just redditors with a somehow bigger superiority complex

  • littleblue✨@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    What if we, and hear me out here… Let it sink into the ocean like it’s been trying to do for generations now? 🤌🏼

  • linuxgator@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s because nobody understands that right turn on red means that you still have to stop and wait for painting traffic to clear before entering the intersection.

    • Daveyborn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      And blame it all on (insert northeastern state name here, preferably New York)

      • linuxgator@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Actually no, it’s more the permanent residents that do that. The northeastern residents are far more likely to cause an accident while trying to merge because they have very different merge laws and think that traffic has to let them merge. And I think most of the Canadians follow the speed limit signs using km/h instead of mph.