In order to use any service provided by Meta one has to already have their head in the sand and pants around their ankles.

Asking for mindfulness in the face of the latest “moral dilemma” posed by Meta is simply not something the user base seems capable of.

Pointing out inconsistencies, fallacies, and weaknesses ain’t a troll.

Pretty funny that you believe you did any of that. Not shocking that you default to the standard troll moves, pretty lazy if you ask me, but funny regardless.

You need to develop self restraint and recognize that your world view must hold up to scrutiny otherwise your belief is a lie if you don’t allow rebuke and correction.

As I stated, I am not here to debate your ignorant thoughts. You should probably take your own advice 9 day old troll.

What is the point of this? That it is easy to separate a fool from their money?

You asked a question, I answered it. Not here to debate your ignorant thoughts.

The groups say the legislation was not necessary to protect the public and harms people most in need of legal name changes

The changes were prompted after B.C. United Leader Kevin Falcon introduced a proposed private member’s bill to change the act after learning that B.C. child killer Allan Schoenborn was legally permitted to change his name to Ken John Johnson.

Schoenborn was found guilty of three counts of first-degree murder for the deaths of his children, aged five, eight and 10, in Merritt, B.C., in 2008, but he was later found to be not criminally responsible because of a mental disorder.

Convicted child-killer Allan Schoenborn legally changed his name in 2021, and it only became public this week

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/bc-offender-name-changes-1.7203213

Seems like the legislation was necessary based on the fact nothing prevented a mentally unwell child murderer from changing their name, which happened years before it was found out.

I am so sick and tired of people who refuse to admit that safe guards are needed to prevent people from abusing systems.

Numerous things require criminal record checks. Will these same people refuse to work because of a required criminal record check? Will they refuse one if they wish to adopt a child? How about refusing a passport for travel?

If you aren’t willing to get a criminal record check to change your name it isn’t that important to you.

I have searched for the philosophy behind such a label but terms like “far right” seem only exist as a pejorative by conformists for superficial reasons.

"Far-right politics, often termed right-wing extremism, encompasses a range of ideologies that are typically marked by radical conservatism, authoritarianism, ultra-nationalism, and nativism.[1] This political spectrum situates itself on the far end of the right, distinguished from more mainstream right-wing ideologies by its opposition to liberal democratic norms and emphasis on exclusivist views. Far-right ideologies have historically included fascism, Nazism, and Falangism, while contemporary manifestations also incorporate neo-fascism, neo-Nazism, white supremacism, and various other movements characterized by chauvinism, xenophobia, and theocratic or reactionary beliefs. "

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Far-right_politics

You didn’t search very hard.

Calling things like Fascism and white supremacy “superficial reasons” to label someone “far right” speaks volumes about you.

Go preach your bull shit elsewhere.

Maybe in the future you can do your own research instead of using the comment box as a search engine.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Far-right_politics

Imagine if the author came out and simply said “What the Likud party is doing is wrong on every level and must be stopped”.

Imagine doing that instead of saying Hamas is justified in their actions by painting a narrative around the US occupying Canadian land and asking us to imagine “what Canadians would do”.

Speaks volumes about the people pushing such a narrative.

What more should be done to give him “help” other than the free time needed to seek it, no pay cut which allows him to pay for it, and no consequences for breaking the law he was tasked to enforce?

He is suspended with pay.

Business as usual.

Fuck the Police.

The only people who care are already against dictatorships.

Stop calling it “Trump style”. It already has a name that everyone knows and it is called Fascism.

The behaviour you’re describing is someone who only has insults for their argument. You cannot win a logical argument so you resort to this.

What is the “logical argument” you believe you have made that I have not responded to?

Is the “insult” throwing back your “undemocratic and partisan” comment and calling it childish projection?

Or was it “insulting” telling you that this

Hopefully the greens and the conservatives refuse to so we have a minority government.

is not how it works?

I am assuming you find both a question about your comment, and calling out your childish behavior, as direct insults on you as a person so please attempt to be clear this time.

Sounds like someone is undemocratic and partisan.

I am happy to see you demonstrate your self awareness even if it had to be delivered with childish projection.

So you just want to scream your non sense at the internet?

Got it. Take care.

The government did not win the majority of the vote so they should not have a majority.

What does this

Hopefully the greens and the conservatives refuse to so we have a minority government.

have to do with that?

Would you mind getting off your soap box for a moment to sort this out?

I think you are the one who needs to explain their point of view regarding an NDP speaker creating a minority Government.

That isn’t how it works.

What makes you think an AGI wouldn’t need our species in some way?