• 2 Posts
  • 281 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle

  • This makes sense. And I can see how to apply when you add more dice with different probability.

    … however, when I did that math, I ended up with 87.04%

    1-((1-.64) x (1-.4) x (1-.4)) = x

    1-(.36 x .6 x .6) = x

    1-.1296 = .8704

    87.04% chance to get 2 winning dice

    Hold up. Something seems off with this.

    I tried calculating the probability of landing 2 losing side by using the same method and it doesn’t add up

    .2 x .2 = .04

    .2 x .5 = .1

    .2 x .5 = .1

    1-((1-.04) x (1-.1) x (1-.1) = x

    1-(.96 x .9 x .9) = x

    1-.7776 = .2224

    22.24% chance to have 2 losing dice.

    But 87.04+22.24 = 109.28%

    You would think that adding the winning combinations to the losing combinations would be 100%

    What am I missing












  • If it helps at all, I didn’t spend my younger years drinking, and I’m still considered friends with most of the people I made friends with in my 20’s. However, I almost never see and/or talk them anymore, just because life gets busy, and it becomes harder to maintain contact. It’s still hard for me to find new friends and people to hang out with. I believe that particular struggle is a pretty shared experience regardless of what our younger selves did. It’s entirely possible that even if you didn’t spend your younger days drinking, that “friend circle” would be just as absent as it is now.

    I think you’re doing great, and the advice of going to the gym and finding a hobby is great advice for yourself too, that’s how I met the friends I have now. it’s a great way to find people who are busy with life, but have made time in their life for their hobby, and you can share that time with them, and badda bing badda boom, friendship.






  • Rome didn’t aggressively expand. It was very unroman to be the aggressor in a war, they only attack in self defense.

    It’s not Rome’s fault that all their neighbors happen to pose a threat to Rome by having the ability to attack, forcing Rome to preemptively attack them in self defense.

    The responsibility of governing the territory that was left over after their enemy’s defeat just happens to fall on Rome since nobody else was around to do it.



  • No, that’s not OK. It’s not ok for a law enforcer to kill anyone for any reason other than in the immediate defense of themselves or other civilians.

    That’s not their job. They are not political assassins. They are law enforcement. They enforce the law. The law is not “kill any traitors on sight” we already know how untrustworthy police officers are, they’ve proven time and time again that they abuse their power as much as possible. It would be incredibly foolish to give them a blanket pass on killing people because the officer determined they were a Nazi.


  • I think it’s important to point out that this is not justifiable because he was a jan 6 rioter, but because he was reaching for a gun.

    It’s a small distinction, but an important one, as justifications can easily stretch to encompass things they shouldn’t. If it’s ok for an officer to kill someone at a traffic stop solely because they were at the riot, then it won’t be long before it’s justification for killing someone at a protest, or just for speaking out.

    So good riddance to bad rubbish in this case, but be wary of dismissing a police officer killing someone just because we don’t like them.