gasp Ned!

This brings up an excellent point about addiction. A quick longer than I’d planned anecdote: over the last few years I’ve nearly completely dumped all social media (and big tech in general). Facebook, Insta, Twitter, all gone. The only social for the last few years I’ve had left was Reddit, and I dumped that a couple months ago (all social media is toxic, I learned).

I swapped Reddit for Lemmy a few months ago and noticed a huge difference, not just the fewer toxic people, but in the lack of posts overall by comparison. I found myself scrolling through the same Lemmy posts throughout the day, my brain trying to repeat the cycle from Reddit, but stayed strong and didn’t go back to Reddit haha.

Anyway, there’s still toxicity on Lemmy, and I realized how much it affects me without the cloud of all the other socials bogging it down. Not a lot, but enough. So I made a decision and went back to my old nerd days. I didn’t want to miss out on legit articles I was interested in from social media so I set up an rss reader. I started checking out Lemmy in the morning, and my rss throughout the day, which doesn’t update often.

What I found at first was I was re-checking lemmy, re-loading rss, and thinking about what else I can put on my phone to scratch that itch. I was (am) still addicted to the dopamine hit of forever-feeds of useless garbage. So instead, I picked up a book. It’s been a long time, and it’s a slow adjustment, but wow is it ever so much better. Aside from some small interaction on Lemmy in the morning like this, I don’t see comments anymore, I read the info I’m interested in reading and make my own judgments without comments trying to sway me, and use my former doom-scrolling time to read a book.

To sum up, you’re absolutely right. Addiction is a bitch and the average person doesn’t even realize they’re addicted.

I hear ya, it’s a shitty situation regardless. Fingers crossed for AB.

That’s the thing though, let them. They won’t get 177k signatures and the petition will fail. Instead, now there’s a good chance that this one will get more than 177k, which means the separatists get their referendum. Whether voting yes means leave or yes means stay, leaving is still up for a vote with either petition.

Just don’t sign it, we’ve already won so why risk losing it when we don’t have to? This new language is just baiting Albertans to get a referendum on something that wouldn’t pass the petition stage to begin with.

Literally, all Albertans have to do is just not sign the damn thing and there won’t even be a referendum.

Electoral reform and the NDP coming out swinging, leaning hard into social programs with a sharp and charismatic leader.

It’s not about which one passes though, they both lead to the same place. It doesn’t matter what choice of words is used for the question to go on the ballot, we don’t want it to be an option at all. The real question both petitions ask is “do you want to have a vote to stay or leave?” If the petition (either one) doesn’t get enough signatures, it won’t be on the ballot at all, and there’s no vote at all.

Look at it this way: separatists want to vote to leave, so they want a referendum. This new guy says “I flipped it on em, get enough signatures now and the question won’t be do you want to leave? It’ll be do you want to stay?” They both have the same result, it’s on the ballot for referendum with the same question worded differently. The separatists get what they want, a referendum.

That’s assuming more Albertans bother voting at all than separatists. The best outcome is separation isn’t even a question on the ballot. Just don’t sign the petition at all and it won’t be.

But we don’t want a referendum. If no one signs, it doesn’t pass to get on the ballot. Whether the ballot says “do you want to stay?” Or “do you want to leave?” it’s the same question. Both petitions lead to the same place - a referendum.

The question right now isn’t whether or not you want to separate, it’s whether or not you want a referendum to put it up for a vote. If you want AB to stay, just don’t sign the petition. An actual referendum would be the worst thing AB can have, regardless of how the question is worded.

But AB is already a part of Canada. If no one signs it, it stays that way. If enough sign it, it triggers a referendum and thus, a risk.

Regardless of which petition got in, the real question for either is “sign if you want a referendum”. If you don’t want AB to leave, just don’t sign.

Unfortunately I suspect the damage is already done and a lot of Albertans are under the impression they should to sign the “stay” petition to save AB, which just gives the separatists exactly what they want - a referendum.

Ah, I didn’t realize that bit. So realistically, just don’t sign it.

So if either petition gets enough signatures it triggers a referendum?

I also know that chatgpt can be better than an asinine conversation with people I work with.

I think that’s the point op is trying to make. AI may have some legit uses, but it simply can’t replace conversation and human connection, and it really is strange when a person uses it to replace human interaction. It’s like only eating junk food. Sure, you feel full, but you’re not getting what you need.

I’m not saying I think it’s wrong to be introverted and not want to engage with others, just that using AI to bridge the gap between yourself and others when you do engage can come across as weird, thoughtless, and potentially flat out insulting.

Common Side Effects was wonderful. Assuming “releases of 2025” refers to new shows this year, I’m also enjoying Murderbot and thought Dope Thief was pretty good.

If only more people treated it like Cassandra instead.

Socializing is more than only talking about what you want to talk about. Also, especially in a work setting with people of different tastes and backgrounds, sometimes something as seemingly asinine as this topic is the only thing a handful of people can find common ground with. Small talk is called small talk for a reason, Conan and Dave never engaged in small talk.

Ditched a science victory as well. What’s left? Religious? Maybe but unlikely. Domination? Even the US can’t do that. Diplomatic? Not a fucking chance. So…points I guess?

Ditched a science victory as well. What’s left? Religious? Maybe but unlikely. Domination? Even the US can’t do that. Diplomatic? Not a fucking chance. So…points I guess?

Especially in today’s sociopoliticalathic climate

And the songs a banger!

Haha but what does it mean?? Is it using ai to search?