Mercury has an average surface temperature of around 167°C, Venus is much hotter with an average of 464°C
Mercury has an average surface temperature of around 167°C, Venus is much hotter with an average of 464°C
There are similar groups with near identical solutions for tackling “problem” River that are some of the worst offenders of plastic pollution.
Ultimately there is still a problem in the ocean, and to some extent, it is inevitable until we have a realistic solution for plastics.
Though, he’s got small hands so what could he possibly do? /s
#WhenTaken #202 (16.09.2024)
I scored 715/1000 🎉
1️⃣ 📍 1253 km - 🗓️ 38 yrs - ⚡ 65 / 200
2️⃣ 📍 192 km - 🗓️ 6 yrs - ⚡ 186 / 200
3️⃣ 📍 249 km - 🗓️ 3 yrs - ⚡ 188 / 200
4️⃣ 📍 8517 km - 🗓️ 5 yrs - ⚡ 101 / 200
5️⃣ 📍 802 km - 🗓️ 1 yrs - ⚡ 175 / 200
Sorry, we had the settings misconfigured and “mildly” scorched your hippocampus.
Let’s be real parking illegally or not paying your debts is bad.
Seriously. Especially with the massive trade tarrifs he’s proposing… You think companies are just going to bend over and accept those extra expenses? No. They are just going to pass that expense onto the consumer as a cost of doing business.
Grammatical question: if it is the sea level rising that is causing the “sinking”, is it really sinking? The land itself is not moving. If I sit in a bathtub and turn the water on, the water rises within the tub. I don’t start sinking.
Under normal circumstances, the debates would help highlight each candidate’s approach to varying topics to help people better understand who they want to vote for.
Trump’s intentional unwillingness to abide by the debate rule makes it little more than a middle school kids insult match.
Maybe the ink for his red thumb print is the wrong color
The article mentions and switches between “lawyers for the state said California” and “lawyers from then-California Attorney General Kamala Harris’ office”, which sounds like it’s intentionally conflating Harris’s direct involvement
This would make sense to include as something that is supplemental to the officers report to help corroborate facts. The question becomes what would happen when the AI summary and officers report conflict
Maybe it’s soil vs rock? I think that there wouldnt have been enough time for new layers to form given how slow of a process it is
deleted by creator
Leonardo DiCaprio holding strong
It’s not necessarily the change itsself that is remarkable, but the rate of change in comparison to past changes that appears to be remarkable.
Second cop says he has a warrant for his arrest when the guy starts trying to go in the house
That just sounds like a poorly designed test. The functionality in the should be easy to understand to allow the testee to identify/provide what the tester is looking for (identify simple bugs, add/improve simple functionality).
When I’ve designed sample live tests, I make it a few simple discrete methods that are 5-8 lines long with a specific intent for each (“what potential issues do you see in this method”, “how could this be improved”, etc.)
Is there a source for this? I am having a hard time believing this is real and not drone footage with the person overlayed on top of it. To be fair the fisheye effect from the camera makes it super uncanny and hard to judge.