![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://midwest.social/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Flemmy.world%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2Fdb7182d9-181a-45e1-b0aa-6768f144911a.jpeg)
And what part did you think was a suggestion?
And what part did you think was a suggestion?
Yeah I didn’t make any suggestions though. But I like your passion
Ridiculous that it wasn’t allowed before.
They don’t like women that much over there. Maybe East Asian women but even then those living in East Asia, not ones in Western countries.
What did you expect from 4chan??
A woman who, from having multiple sexual partners, has her stuff look like roast beef. Another reply mentioned older women but it is used for any woman, really.
It’s… yeah.
If they set up machine gun nests and military shit like that the Republicans can just claim that that’s a Democrat takeover. Can’t win
Can’t you read, they were being unprofessional!
Wtf salmiakki tastes great you heathen
It is forbidden for Christians to kill. However…
Double purist, the only way to be
Wouldn’t white cookouts be steak and burgers and that sorta stuff
It’s really disappointing
Because it’s a comparison most people understand and it put things in perspective. Seems obvious enough to me.
I’ll just order it to-go
Nostalgia at least is one factor
Those reactors were ancient and, even without the nuclear power phaseout, they would’ve needed to be replaced.
Would the timeline have been the same?
The choice was build wind turbines and solar panels and upgrade the grid or spend the same amount of money on building nuclear reactors that still rely on imported fuel that needs to be mined in some third world country in an extremely environmentally destructive way
Solar panels at least use a lot of imported materials from what I’ve read. So similar issues there. Not sure which ends up as the lesser evil for the third world.
Idk if you read the article but this is specifically about US provided weaponry