After reading and watching way too much content related to this, I think this has been blown way out of proportion.

I don’t understand how anyone can honestly say that RHEL is going closed source when they know that’s factually incorrect. I don’t understand how anyone can say they’re changing from Fedora to Ubuntu and not see the colossal irony on that. If anything, I can understand the position of RH even more. If I made a 1:1 clone distro of Fedora, nobody would give a shit about it. So, the ONLY incentive of using a 1:1 clone of RHEL is saving money.

And please, spare me the “Alma Linux is a gateway to RHEL”, because any sane business will take any opportunity to save money.

Why not taking CentOS, direct upstream of RHEL, and use its code to create a RHEL competitor? Why not taking RHEL code, modify it and make a different distro instead of a bug-for-bug clone? (They’ve encouraged this in their blog post). The more I read, the more I feel it is because it takes work, simple as.

Antifa members have commited actual crimes, including some that costed lives, and supported those who did so. They use terror tactics on a regular basis coercing and silencing others. Even though I think their behavior is more fascistic than any current far right organization, I don’t think they should be banned or silenced. In any case, I don’t expect them to be banned here in any shape or form because they support and enforce the message currently approved by every major public institution and corporation.

Thanks, I’ve been using Lidarr + beets and other stuff, and this seems to pack it all up, and more!

EDIT: Can’t deploy it in arm64 arch.