• 0 Posts
  • 11 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 10th, 2023

help-circle




  • What your saying doesn’t exist is an Artificial General Intelligence, something approaching the conscious human mind. Your right that doesn’t exist.

    AI doesn’t just mean that though.

    What we’re dealing with right now is the computer equivalent of growing mouse brain cells in a petre dish, plugging them into inputs and outputs & getting them to do useful things for us.

    The way you describe chat GPT not being creative, is also theoretically how our own brains work in the creative processes. If you study story structure & mythology you’d find that ALL successful stories boil down to a very minimalist set of archetypes & types of conflict.



  • I mean, it absolutely can return, but it’s not going to be like my grandfather’s time where he could support a family of four (with a vacation home) on what he earned building Buicks.

    The level of automation in factories here in the US is already below what it should be, as the Unions are fighting to keep those jobs in human hands.

    Fewer jobs & substantially higher automation.

    The value of unskilled labor is going to continue to diminish, it’s peak value before, during & after WWII was the historical anomaly not the norm. Before the industrial revolution, you mostly had to know how to do shit to be of value, and in the post industrial era you once again have to have skills to be of value. The biggest issue is those skills are changing and evolving at a rapid pace, instead of remaining stagnant for generations like before the industrial revolution.






  • Firstly, certain groups have over politicized this topic in order to punch down on a minority group they dislike. Those people are ass holes, and I’m not defending that behavior. However, unfortunately, their base argument does actually have some marret, even if they are complete ass holes about it.

    There is consistency, to use your terminology cis gender women can compete with cis gender women & cis gender men compete against cis gender men. Transgender folk are somewhere around 1% (or less) of the over all population, they are the extreme outliers that don’t fit this consistent & highly effective (in terms of athletics) categorization of men’s & women’s sports. Another group, roughly the same size with an unknown advantage/disadvantage that are excluded from this classification are amputees/augmented humans.

    We currently have separate competition for amputees from non amputees, the Paralympics exist & is lauded as a good thing. Outside of the political oppression issues, this model makes far more sense for trans athletes then simply allowing them to compete with the gender they identify with.

    Splitting competition into male/female makes sense, because sexual dimorphism is a reality for our species. In nearly every sport, women are highly disadvantaged against men. Statistically the physical divergence between the sexes is vastly larger then the divergence within the sexes. This is consistent, despite your argument to the contrary.

    I’m all for trans people being treated with respect, but respect goes both ways & part of that respect is the admission that a trans woman is not the same as a woman, and a trans man is not the same as a man. These are 4 different & distinct categories of people (hence the desire to relabel two of those groups with the ‘cis’ moniker), and ignoring that reality causes more problems then it will ever fix. It is not transphobic to prefer dating cis gender people, nor is it transphobic to believe that men & women’s sports should be for men & women respectively. Both of these CAN be transphobic if your being a hateful dick about it, but it’s not inherently so in holding those opinions.