I’m not CS smart enough to understand this… 😢

Plrase please please do this

It’s really hard to reason with the car-brained NIMBYs, it seems… They want nothing short of “more cars.” It’s a cancerous idiology that can’t see past the steering wheel, so to speak.

“Look! New white shoes!”

I would usually agree with this kind of normalization, but in this case I actually think it would actually obfuscate the picture. Safer roads are a good thing, but if traffic deaths are reduced because more people bike or take the train, that’s still a win. Roads and cars are inherently dangerous, and that danger needs to be minimized using multiple strategies. We need to focus on holistic changes that consider people’s behaviour and their interactions with the built environment.

When people feel they absolutely need to drive, that’s a failure of infrastructure.

Don’t try to change their mind, but rather, ask them why they believe that. Talk about their reasoning for holding that position. Point it out gently when their reasons don’t make sense. Ask them “if details were different, would you still believe what you believe?” Ask them what they would need to see to change their mind.

Can you elaborate on what you mean by this?

Ah yes, the shelling of a desperate crowd to bring order. Makes sense… /s

all your base are belong to us

You really need to clean your fireplace

Not to add too much credibility to noncredibledefense, but uranium salts would just burn with a particular color like any other metal salt. Uranium is not explosive unless you force it to undergo a fision chain reaction under very specific conditions.

They definitely mean “net zero” as in “get rid of them all” and not “input=output”…

It’s strange how many could shrug off the genocidal crimes of Nazi scientists, all while doing this to one of the creators of modern computing just for acting a bit gay… Condoning murder while condemning love…

Do you have a therapist you can talk to about this?