![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/1801fd1d-aa94-416b-ab31-be0103b4ccfa.png)
this uses poore nemecek 2018 and so it can be safely ignored
this uses poore nemecek 2018 and so it can be safely ignored
icewind dale
homeworld
fftactics (I beat the final boss but I overlooked the side quest to master summoner)
then there is no need to lie about the position the academy
this is a leap of logic. there is not direct correlation, and your accusation of bad faith is, itself, bad faith.
they have published a version of this position continually since the early '90s at least. if you look at the position paper that’s linked, you can see the specifics. this position has expired and not been renewed for years. that is good reason to believe that it will not be renewed and will no longer be the position of the academy.
it’s entirely true. they don’t care how it tastes, they care if they get paid
it’s not their current position, and linking it, and saying it is their position, is dishonest.
animals aren’t killed for taste. it’s usually for profit.
since the paper you linked expired
edit:
all current positions of the academy
double edit:
i see you are not the one who linked the expired paper. whoops.
the movement is growing
google trends says otherwise
this is no longer the position of the academy.
it is no longer the position of the academy of nutrition and dietetics that vegetarian, including vegan, diets are healthful, nutritionally adequate, and may provide health benefits for the prevention and treatment of certain diseases. it hasn’t been for years. you should stop spreading misinformation.
do you think .world admins care?
it is possible to feed a vegan world, and it would actually be easier
it’s even easier to feed a world with no living creatures. that doesn’t make it desirable
We could grow far more food by repurposing that land.
if that were the case, why aren’t we? it seems there must be a good reason that in the over half decade since this paper’s publication, surely we could have revolutionized our food production. instead, even though veganism saw a steady rise from before the publication of that paper until 2020, it’s been in decline since then. somehow i don’t think that paper captured the whole scope of our agricultural system.
https://lemmy.zip/pictrs/image/5c433cba-a635-48ab-b875-3b5530480e89.webp
this seems to say (near the bottom there) that basically everything a cow eats (52 of 54 units or there about) is either grazed grass or crop residues, with only like 2 or 3 of those units (so about 4-6%, in round numbers) comes from crops grown to feed them. i don’t really know the dietary composition of a chicken or swine, but, cattle, at least, get essentially no direct crops at all.
one calorie of meat requires 6 calories of crops.
ah, but much of the crops that are fed to animals are the byproducts of our own agricultural processes. by feeding them to cattle we get more calories than we would, since we won’t eat, for instance, cottonseeds and corn stalks.
it’s on the decline, and it will be a thing of the past in my lifetime
I asked nypl to let me pay for a library card. they won’t issue. they will issue if I walk into a branch, but it’s a temporary card unless I can prove residency.
I don’t think they should have their budget cut but I would pay a subscription fee to access it from out-of-state.
misandry doesn’t real