![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
Are capybaras docile to humans?
Are capybaras docile to humans?
A few, you say.
Care to list them, please? Or are they just Fairphone models?
I wasn’t going for an ethymological argument. Plenty of examples of words whose meaning veered away from its ethymology.
But the recent popularization of literally as a synonym of figuratively, well, it literally rustles my jimmies.
Sure, but photos altered with AI is not the point of the article. In the article a photographer said that he suspects that the cropping/flattening tool he used somehow used AI, and therefore the AI metadata was included in the picture.
So, while the action using AI is “technically correct,” the photographer simply wanted to crop his picture; something that has been possible for decades without AI. He wasn’t aware of AI being used. And now Facebook includes the tag because of the AI over-engineered bullshit.
Personally, I don’t place all the blame on Facebook. They’re simply reading the metadata, and if the metadata says “yo, we used AI,” then welp, it gets the label. So, the editing tools are also to blame here.
I guess now I know. Before uploading a photo to Facebook/Instagram/whatever, I’ll make sure to remove the exif metadata.
Interesting! Today I learned, then. Thanks.
Now, and this I’m going to say in a sort-of tongue-in-cheek manner, what’s your opinion on the recent change of the meaning of “literally”? Because that one is definitely less (ha!) than 200 years old.
I would normally agree with you.
But just as it’s okay for people to speak the way they want, it’s also okay for people to spread language knowledge. Then let the people decide whether they want to use that knowledge or not.
It’s not like OP said “it’s ‘fewer’, you idiot!” In that case, I’d say it’s elitism. Otherwise, it’s just a useful lemmy comment.
Years in the making is correct. Whether it’s 5 years or 5 billion years, that’s years in the making.
I mean, if you lose the game, you lose the game. You don’t say “hey you made me lose the game! Don’t do that!” Because that’s not how the game works. If you “make” someone lose the game, tough luck.
By the way, you lost game again :)
Ok, sure. But this is common knowledge. Private browsing is about not leaving trace on the local machine. It was never about remaining anonymous on the internet.
I thought you were referring to the browser sending browsing history to Google somehow.
Wait… private tabs sends info to Google? How? Do you mean by clicking analytics links?
What I don’t like about these types of articles is that they always skip over the fact that TRUMP LOST TO BIDEN WHILE BEING A SITTING PRESIDENT.
People wised up and they now know that all it matters is to go out and vote.
Was this an elaborate way to make me lose the game? Ass!
Like what?
Ha, cool! It’s been a while since I saw that movie.
Man, 1998?! Time flies.
What’s this in reference to?
He was selling it to Al-Cateda.