

What good are blind signatures if the users of IP addresses are known? The bigger problem is that the state can block access to social networks for individual citizens.
What good are blind signatures if the users of IP addresses are known? The bigger problem is that the state can block access to social networks for individual citizens.
You will get that war. The USA and China will clash and the EU is preparing to take care of Russia when that war starts.
Heatpumps in front of houses.
For those attacks the size doesn’t matter but the willingness of breaking the law. My size argument is that the USA and China will clash. Europe will engage Russia when that happens.
Thank you for your insightful feedback. Have a great WE, too.
Voter and voted are not the same.
It shows that the ones who are so against women, gay, drag, trans were easily distracted by superficial showmanship. It’s actually sad that they can’t perceive inner values.
When all you have is two hammers, one of them starts to look like a nail.
Insightful
So you’re genuinely advocating breaking international law?
No, I just believe that the EU will break the law and attack, like members already did in Libya and Iraq.
I can also say that I was not the one talking about fantasies.
Edit and yes, there is a need to wait for Ukraine EU membership
Is there a reason for that? UN article 51 seems to allow support of other countries if they are attacked.
Too simple for an explanation, they are not stupid.
Ukraine soldiers are trained for 3 months. There can’t be much infrastructure needed for an attack since the battle is on enemy territory when it starts.
Also, surely you’re aware that wars of aggression are banned in international law?
Iraq, Libya and others. At worst we call it a special military operation in support of Ukraine.
That’s why we need to get Ukraine to the EU, so that then it’s not a war of aggression, but honoring the mutual defense clause.
I guess there is no need to wait for EU membership to help a country in need.
Oh and, in which country’s military forces would you be participating in this attack fantasy?
None. After these comments at most they will use me for medical support.
So the laws won’t protect the children. Then why do those laws exist?
That’s why the new weapons are needed, to prepare for an attack.
Why else would Europe need those weapons? Russia has problems fighting Ukraine. How could they fight Europe?
Btw, I say we because any serious war will use the entire population, like Ukraine.
A European attack is prevented by critical voices from within Europe. If those voices are removed we will attack despite the threat of nuclear bombs.
By presenting an arbitrary other motivation, which implies that there is no obvious motivation.
Yet why does my reasoning not make sense? We fought in Libya. Everybody hates Russia and would be eager to fight if Russia didn’t have nuclear bombs. Remove the critical voices and we are ready to go.
It could be. So you agree that the surveillance laws don’t make much sense?
True if you narrow down the in-group enough and are part of it.
Why else would it be introduced? If they don’t plan to lock down the entire internet, the age verification is useless. It could be security theater but it receives full media attention. So it is important. What else but war could be so important that it demands so much power over civil liberty?
This is going to happen. The European age verification and messenger surveillance are preparations to control any remaining opposition for that war.
Then said he used that for evil as he trashed all his friends and wives in a patty
That would mean that Epstein had nothing on Trump. Would Trump betray Epstein’s friends if Epstein could destroy him?
Die aus Kasachstan stammende
Schau an ihnen, blutige Katholiken
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/labor-share-of-gdp
60% of GDP are wages. People can earn 50% more if all profits would be handed out as wages.