His reputation, future, and even perhaps the White House’s destiny, will on Wednesday be placed in the hands of 12 citizens of his native New York City, proving that not even once-and-possibly future commanders in chief are above the law.

Seven men and five women jurors will retire for deliberations on Trump’s six-week hush money trial after Judge Juan Merchan instructs them on the law and their duties. No jury in American history has faced such a task — deciding whether a former president and presumptive major party nominee will be convicted of a crime. And while the jury, which can deliberate for as long as it needs, is bound to decide its verdict on 34 felony charges on the testimony and evidence in the case alone, its decision will reverberate across the nation and the world at a critical moment of the 2024 presidential election.

The trial slogged toward its end on Tuesday in nearly 10 hours of closing arguments that burst into open hostility between rival lawyers.

“You have to put aside the distractions, the press, the politics, the noise. Focus on the evidence and the logical inference that can be drawn from that evidence,” prosecution lawyer Joshua Steinglass told the jury.

“In the interest of justice and in the name of the people of the state of the New York, I ask you to find the defendant guilty. Thank you.”

  • SaintWacko
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    I think I’ll wait for the verdict and sentencing to see whether he’s above the law or not

      • Stovetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        28 days ago

        That’s optimistic.

        I am expecting at least 1 Trump loyalist in the jury who will refuse to agree to any guilty verdict, resulting in a hung jury and a mistrial.

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          28 days ago

          A single holdout doesn’t necessarily mean a hung jury. If there is evidence of juror misconduct, like a juror making any indication that they never intended to be impartial, despite what they agreed to before the trial started, they can be removed and replaced by a backup.

          There are 6 backup jurors for this case.

        • suction@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          27 days ago

          As a European, I’ll never get why Americans think it’s ok to let the general public who are 85% fucking morons be the deciding factor in complicated legal cases. Why do you even have judges and lawyers when in the end they have nothing to decide?

      • 800XL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        28 days ago

        And some bullshit exception will be made so he can still run for the Presidency because someone will allow him to serve his sentence after his potential term. Either that or he’ll be made to have some aide follow him around and pretend to act like an ankle alarm because he has a brand to uphold and a real one would cause harm.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      28 days ago

      The scary thing: There are people out there who will change their vote depending on whether or not he’s convicted.