Squeezed by high interest rates and record prices, homeowners are frozen in place. They can’t sell. So first-time buyers can’t buy.

If buying a home is an inexorable part of the American dream, so is the next step: eventually selling that home and using the equity to trade up to something bigger.

But over the past two years, this upward mobility has stalled as buyers and sellers have been pummeled by three colliding forces: the highest borrowing rates in nearly two decades, a crippling shortage of inventory, and a surge in home prices to a median of $434,000, the highest on record, according to Redfin.

People who bought their starter home a few years ago are finding themselves frozen in place by what is known as the “rate-lock effect” — they bought when interest rates were historically low, and trading up would mean a doubling or tripling of their monthly interest payments.

They are locked in, and as a result, families hoping to buy their first homes are locked out.

Non-paywall link

  • archomrade [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    15 days ago

    You’re forgetting landlords (of all sizes)

    It’s extremely common in my generation to sit on their first house to rent out as passive income, and plenty of private investment absorbing starter homes to rent as well

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      15 days ago

      More specially, investment groups.

      When a monthly mortgage and monthly rent are about the same in a market, then your average Joe Schmoe, will only make money if they’re speculating on a neighborhood. Buy low, let the renter cover the mortgage, sell when the neighborhood comes up.

      Wall Street doesn’t need to speculate. Investment groups can buy with cash and the rent coming in is all additive.

      • archomrade [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 days ago

        I specifically included individual home owners who sit on their properties to rent instead.

        If we’re talking about retired couples downsizing into starters and established families not up-sizing as a part of the larger market dynamics, then homeowners hording their starter home are just as much of a problem.

        Investment groups are a much larger problem for sure, but even the smaller players contribute to the larger market trends.

        • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 days ago

          Depends on the market / part of the country through. Hoarding a starter home can be hard to pull off in a lot of markets. Many people usually need to sell the first house in order to cobble fun the 20% down on a larger, more expensive, home.

          • archomrade [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            But young professionals who have stayed in their starter for more than 6 or 7 years typically have far more expendable income than when they first signed their mortgage, and can afford to save enough to put down 10 or 20 percent on a newer house (typically further out where the cost/sf is lower) without having to use the proceeds of a sale