Lmao good luck then
Lmao good luck then
Lol
Ill mark my calendar for one year from now and let you know
Jesus christ, is that what politics are to you? Flattery or contempt?
Know better than the guy saying ‘trust me bro’?
idk, that’s a pretty high bar to clear
Undecided voters are imo always a contemptible lot
Maybe read this a few times yourself and see if you can spot the problem on your own.
Lmao, I don’t even know how to respond to that without sounding like a fossil
There’s no such thing as neutral - either we’re supporting Israel through their genocide or we’re not.
No, they don’t just disappear - libs just stop caring about them for another 3 years until they’re needed again.
Then she should have messaged better on Israel
I’d much rather her do more than message better, but i’d take clear messaging over whatever the fuck we’ve been getting.
Heh.
I’m asking who you’ll decide to blame, since that seems to be the focus.
If you’re unconcerned with blame then maybe there’s no disagreement here.
How are we defining ‘flawless’, exactly?
All else aside - yea, I actually kinda agree with this, though I get the distinct impression not in the way you mean it.
edit - what happens if it’s the undecided vote that causes harris to lose, not Stein?
Ignoring people instead of, what?.. Railing against voters who are rightfully upset at Harris’s ambivalence about Israel’s genocide?
You think constantly yelling at undecided protestors and blaming them for “Jim Crow V2 - Electric Boogaloo” is going to change their mind?
Get over yourself. The only good that comes from whining about third party candidates spoiling democratic victory is situating the blame if/when Harris loses. It does nothing to convince undecideds, and I’d argue it turns a lot of casual voters off from going to the booth at all.
Might even be radicalizing progressives into tankies, wouldn’t that be exciting.
People just want someone to be mad at in case Harris loses
Because Harris losing simply could not be her own fault, if it happened
There isn’t a law that I’m aware of, but typically the ad needs to be un-skippable/seek-able, which means there will always be some indication to the video player of what the user can skip or fast forward through.
That doesn’t mean Google couldn’t just make fast forwarding/seeking a premium feature, but they’d lose a lot of user appeal if they did so they probably wouldn’t do that
The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house
The fact that this has not been taken down for editorialization is a huge indictment of this comm and it’s moderation
This is alex-jones level of mispresentation
Democrats keep conceding right-leaning policies as if Republicans actually just want those policies
Republicans are reactionary - they don’t just want tougher immigration policies. They want to hurt immigrants. If democrats push right, Republicans will just go further.
There is no moderate right-wing position that can win over moderate Republicans that they can’t beat by going further right.