• lengau
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Where on earth did you get that from my comment? If one genocide is bad, surely that same genocide (although arguably made more effective) plus an entirely separate, second genocide is worse?

      • lengau
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        You’re very good at misrepresenting what people say. Are you saying that 2 genocides is not worse than 1 genocide?

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          No I’m finding out where you stop voting for Democrat.

          Say Trump does 25 Genocides and the Democrats 24. What are you voting for?

          • lengau
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            I will always use my vote to the maximum effect of harm reduction. Why aren’t you?

              • lengau
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                I said harm reduction, not living in a fantasy world.

                  • lengau
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Any action, including inaction when you can act, is participating. I’m choosing the most effective way to minimise the harm.

                    Why are you trying to encourage people to take actions that have the result of making the situation worse? Why are you supporting more genocide?