• Mjpasta710
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    So you’re acknowledging that the actions in China against Uighurs also amount to genocidal?

    I also mentioned multiple times the genocide in the comment you’re quoting, and you’re choosing to overfocus on the single time I didn’t.

    I’m glad we’re in agreement. It seemed you were trying to make a different point.

    Given the sheer volume and consistency of evidence from multiple independent sources, it is difficult to dispute the compelling case of widespread human rights violations.

    • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.comBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      No, reported violations of human rights during a reduced and specific timeframe in a counter- terrorist campaign accompanied by massive investment in economic development, dont amount to genocidal.

      volume and consistency of evidence from multiple independent sources

      That is if you swallow CIA propaganda only

      • Mjpasta710
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Calling the comprehensive evidence of human rights abuses against Uighurs ‘CIA propaganda’ dismisses the work of:

        • Independent UN investigators who found credible allegations of crimes against humanity.
        • Respected international human rights organizations that conduct meticulous, on-the-ground investigations and collect survivor testimonies.
        • Academic scholars who publish peer-reviewed research.
        • Journalists from around the world who have risked their safety to document these realities.

        These are not government intelligence agencies. Their findings are based on a volume and consistency of evidence that stands up to scrutiny, regardless of how inconvenient it may be to label it as such. The narrative of ‘economic development’ doesn’t negate systematic human rights abuses.