• Bernie2028
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    “War” implies the US and Mexico mutually fighting. Libya was military intervention not war.

      • Bernie2028
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Well yeah, you OBJECTIVELY can’t call what happened in Libya a “war”. It was bad and unnecessary, but by definition, not a war… You did not have US troops fighting Libyan troops.

        • brain_in_a_box [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          11 months ago

          So because the US troops were using weapons the Libyan troops couldn’t effectively fight back against, it doesn’t count as a war?

          “It wasn’t a battle, it was a just a massacre, so it’s OK”

          • Bernie2028
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            You’re fighting with the air. I very clearly said Libya wasn’t ok.

            You’re right, massacres aren’t battles and we shouldn’t call them that. Of course that doesn’t make it any better but why call it a battle if it’s not?

    • FALGSConaut [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      11 months ago

      Of course, I forgot when you call it something other than war then it’s not a war! That’s why we have the Korean Police Action, the Vietnam Police Action, the Police Actions in Panama and Grenada, Desert Police Action 1 & 2 in Iraq, and the Global Police Action on Terror! None of those were wars, right?