• frezik
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    This, right here, is really important. We already have otherwise useful things being bricked because the software is no longer updated, or worse, the company goes bankrupt. If that’s our future with brain implants, that’s going to be a big problem.

    • FlowVoid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Doctors remove unsafe implants and/or replace them with safer versions all the time, including devices like deep brain stimulators. I don’t see why you consider this to be a big problem.

      • frezik
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Because every surgery has risks, including simple ones. In this case, there would be no direct medical reason to do so.

        • FlowVoid
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          There was a medical reason, the device was considered unsafe. Any experimental device is considered unsafe without monitoring, and monitoring was no longer available. That’s why she chose to have it removed.

          Anyone who signs up for a clinical trial knows that their treatment can be discontinued at any time, even if it is helping them. For example, if an implant is helping you but is found to be harming other people, it may be considered unsafe and you may be advised to remove it. In fact, a different article suggested that other patients were experiencing adverse effects from this experimental implant. This might even be why the company couldn’t get their product approved and eventually lost funding.