I’ve never heard someone say the N word in person until today I think. One minority (aboriginal) telling me how something about blacks but using the N word instead of blacks/African-american.

There are a lot of other smaller instances I’ve seen in my personal life too.

I’ve never seen Indian versus Pakistan racism, but I would at least get why that might happen, since history.

In public policy, the majority (caucasians) are prob the most racist here, but in casual conversation I might hear more minority vs minority racism. I think this partially might be because caucasians have it drilled into them (my city) that they have to not be racist in convo?

I’ve never understood why some minority groups didn’t come out to support black lives matter (here), but it seems to look like bc they don’t care to help out blm bc its not explicitly minority-name-here lives matter

☹️

  • @TheConquestOfBed@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    2
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Nonwhite people aren’t a monolith because they think they are, they’re a monolith because the concept of whiteness and the way white people relate to them has made them one, regardless of their own relations to one another.

    The difference between historic ethnic discrimination and modern racism is the arbitrary drawing up of racial lines around groups of people who form heterogenous clines of different genetic groups and cultures. Racism against “middle eastern west asians” functionally includes Arabs, Indo-Iranians, Sikhs, Tuareg, Kurds, Palestinians, Algerians, Moroccans, Turks, and Kazakhs and a bunch of other cultures who don’t exactly identify with one another but are lumped together in this mixed bag of convenient colonial categorization based on their relation to colonial production. Like a Moroccan person and a Pakistani person would more than likely be offended if you counted them as “the same”. And for good reason, their histories, base forms, and superstructural forms are distinct and erasing that distinction is meant to open them to commodification and exploitation. For another example, in the western mind, latin america is “that place where fruit and coffee comes from,” which erases local cultures to conform them to the global role capital has assigned to them. It’s in-part the sort of thing the Zapatistas are fighting against in their cultural war against Mexican liberalism.

    These modern lines began to form during the colonial period of western history. During the medieval period, discrimination was based on religion. Laws and cultural norms targeted muslims, lutherans, calvinists, catholics, etc. Slavery laws were formed on the basis of religion, where adoption of christianity could buy the freedom of a black or indigenous person (or their children) after they’ve fulfilled their contract. Then in the 17th and 18th centuries, something shifted in the Caribbean. Creoles were beginning to form communities where locally born whites, blacks, and indigenous people started to have more in common with one another than with the “metropole” of the European power exploiting their labor. They began to form coalitions to overthrow the colonial government, and often freed slaves (who could form up to 80% of a colony) to gain the proper mass line.

    This spooked the Europeans immensely so their response was vicious. They rewrote slavery laws to no longer be religious, but instead be based on skin color, making the caste of slave immutable and heritable. The mixed-race creole bourgeoisie were destroyed and scattered, some even enslaved, and lost all their status to white immigrants.

    Whiteness was invented at this point, a camraderie between europeans based on shared heritage in order to separate themselves from the slave class. It became illegal to enslave or indenture whites. It became illegal to intermarry with whites. It became illegal to show aggression toward whites. And this change in status consolidated the previously differentiated creole whites, lower class colonist whites, upper class colonists, and the gentry under one unified group. This white supremacist group still exists today, and has come to allow or deny various cultures into its ranks based on its political goals.

    With the theory of white supremecist racism (as an important tool of capitalist imperialism), it becomes easy to see why the distinction of Ukrainians as white and Russian/Baltic slavs as nonwhite has a chilling effect on the entirety of white culture. It justifies the acceptance of Ukranian refugees into the “cilvilized” imperial class and demotes slavs to the enslaved/colonized class (as all GZD users have pointed out with news articles). When we say “you can’t be racist to white people”, what we mean is that you can’t reverse this relation just with words or behaviors, especially as an individual. Racial discrimination toward white people doesn’t carry the same class distinctions. Say, for example, a Palestinian landlord denies housing to an Israeli. This is discriminitory, but it doesn’t have the same class character as an Israeli landlord denying housing to a palestinian. The former is technically anti-colonial and the latter is distinctly colonial.

    TL;DR: In order to be racist to white people you have to change global class relations and dismantle Eurocentric neocolonial imperialism.

    • Ratto
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Thank you for wording this better than I ever could 🥰

      • @TheConquestOfBed@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        Nah, you did fine. You used all the academic stuff. I just tried to make it sound more “marxist” as there’s a huge overlap in concepts. If hegemony/white supremacy and capitalist imperialism were on a Venn Diagram, it’d just be a circle. They’re different co-moving facets of the same thing.

        • Ratto
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Ngl I panicked the fuck out when I was accused of a “disturbingly racist rant” so it was validating that you and commiewolf recognised the point I was making. I’m no expert after all so I wouldn’t be able to ace the point if ya get me.

          This is exactly the same situation as when I left the anarchist sub on reddit many moons ago. BAME Comrade essentially explained what I’ve put above and the white majority of the sub freaked out and dogpiled them for “being a racist to whites” for bringing up the concept of whiteness.

          “If hegemony/white supremacy and capitalist imperialism were on a Venn Diagram, it’d just be a circle.”

          Lol this is too accurate.

          • ☭CommieWolf☆
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            You elaborated on one aspect of it very clearly, nothing racist about that at all. It is important to recognize that these sort of things are done by different people for different material reasons. Discriminated people come in different forms, and their history of oppressions will shape how their outlook towards other discriminated groups is. Its not racist to recognize the inherent racial hierarchy and how it shapes these views. It is one of many factors that can lead to discrimination among minorities. I think you explained it well.

            • Ratto
              link
              fedilink
              22 years ago

              Thank you, I’ll make sure not to get too focused in on one facet in the future 😊