• explore_broaden
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 months ago

    When you’re an enterprise client paying serious money for the service, there are often data protection requirements. They have the capability to support things like export controlled information or HIPAA compliance in office, and appropriate legal agreements ensuring data protection. It’s the power of collective bargaining (they are buying 100s++ licenses instead of just one).

    • MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      Exactly. If it’s a regulated industry, they’re not just paying for Teams. They’re paying for someone else to worry about meeting certain compliance requirements and take the heat if things go wrong. I’m not sure how many companies besides Microsoft can offer that. At most it’s a fraction of the available options.

    • person420@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s probably more than 100s. One of my Slack orgs has over 300 paid users and Slack barely considers us midsize.

      • explore_broaden
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah that’s why I added the ++, the last org I was in had >10k users.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Facebook is usually not used by businesses which expect it to be in compliance with compex healthcare regulations, the law is spelled HIPAA, and that article is about the UK, which doesn’t have that law.