The Republican-led U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill on Thursday that would force President Joe Biden to send weapons to Israel, seeking to rebuke the Democrat for delaying bomb shipments as he urges Israel to do more to protect civilians during its war with Hamas.

The Israel Security Assistance Support Act was approved 224 to 187, largely along party lines. Sixteen Democrats joined most Republicans in voting yes, and three Republicans joined most Democrats in opposing the measure.

The act is not expected to become law, but its passage underscored the deep U.S. election-year divide over Israel policy as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government seeks to wipe out militants who attacked Israel on Oct. 7, killing around 1,200 people and seizing 253 hostages, according to Israeli tallies.

  • Tinidril
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    The Republicans voted to pass a bill in the House to send the weapons. It will almost certainly fail in the Senate but, even if it doesn’t, Biden would have to sign it into law. I don’t see Biden signing a bill to override himself, and there is no way that Congress would get the required 2/3 in each chamber to override. This bill was just a performative stunt.

    • xantoxis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      67
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Sure but the point is, after months of pithy quips about how the Democrats will support genocide of the Palestinians and the Republicans will support genocide of everyone including the Palestinians;

      here we see that even on this specific issue, the parties have differences. So make the right choice.

      • Tinidril
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Did I say otherwise?

        This isn’t wrong, but this argument gets made over and over and over again in every political thread on almost every topic, whether or not it fits the flow of the conversation. People don’t want to be preached at and it’s going to be self defeating.

        EDIT: Tone deaf establishment apologists are going to lose again and still not understand why. “Republicans suck more” is far less compelling than some people think, no matter how true. Winning elections and winning arguments are different things.

    • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It says exactly that in the 3rd paragraph of the summary.

      The act is not expected to become law …

      • Tinidril
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        Um, OK, but I was responding to a comment that said something different.

    • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Why would he have to sign it into law? He could veto it. Might even be just the excuse he needs to stop supporting a genocide. As if just supporting the genocide wasn’t enough, now he can say he’s not supporting the Republicans too.

      • Tinidril
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        30 days ago

        That’s what I meant. For it to take effect he would have to sign it into law. There is no reason for him to do that.