• jkrtn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Most people wouldn’t labor 40+ hours a week for the wages they are getting if they had alternative methods of obtaining food, healthcare, and housing. There is no real-world “free exchange.” You have to deliberately ignore the coercive part to pretend it doesn’t exist, because it is obvious. People need to participate in the economy to survive.

    • aidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I agree it is coercive, but not because of a need for food or shelter. That need is the natural state of humanity, there is no one imposing that need on you. There is no one coercing. But I absolutely agree there are plenty of other coercive factors.

      • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Would you accept if I say “exploitative” instead of “coercive?” I just think for the economic model to price things efficiently, inelastic goods like being alive need to be external to the model. I disagree with describing what we have as a willing exchange.

        • aidan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          There definitely can be exploitative factors, just like coercive factors, and housing for example to an extent is exploitative, as in exploited by politicians. But I don’t think food sales are really exploitative.