When society falls, the great femboy regime will rise from its ashes. All children will take puberty blockers. We will teach you to love your neighbor through the shared trauma of forced feminization. We will know peace in our time 😌

(If anyone is mad at me, please know that ARF ARF BARK ARRROOOOOOOO AROOOO ฅ⁠⁠•⁠ﻌ⁠•⁠⁠ฅ I’m just a dumb puppy. I’m committing to bits beyond your comprehension✨ I mean UwU)

  • L/nerd@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m not suggesting solving all our mental health problems will stop billionaires from existing (though in truth, class disparity creating the stressors it does would definitely make stopping billionaires help population mental health), nor am I suggesting that billionaires should get any sort of excuse. I am pointing out how people in abusive class positions (i.e. billionaires) can still be high-empathy people, and how sociopath literally isn’t a diagnosis anymore. I believe you are having a reading comprehension issue.

    • Clent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      No. There are no “high empathy” billionaires. There are most certainly still people diagnosied with sociopathy.

      I don’t know why you feel the need to make such baseless arguments, blaming it on my reading comprehension is doesn’t seem to fit. I’m reading you fine, I’m simply calling bullshit.

      • L/nerd@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Solving our mental health problem won’t prevent billionaires from existing.

        Didn’t say it would. I have no idea where you pulled this from.

        Making excuses for billionaires isn’t a mental health issue, it’s an intelligence issue.

        I alsi wasn’t giving any slack to billionaires. I also have no idea where you pulled this from.

        Both of the above statements from you imply you either didn’t read my comment or understand what it said, primarily because they feel like arguments intended for an entirely different comment. Please tell me how I can best rephrase it if I communicated my ideas unclearly at all.

        Also, please refer me to the part of the DSM-5 where it lists “sociopath” as a possible diagnosis.