• mycathas9lives@mastodon.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        @brain_in_a_box @Rakonat

        I cannot agree with this statement.

        Consider how many genocides have occurred since the 1948 convention and its ratification in 1951. Now consider that three have been legally recognised – and led to trials – under the convention:

        Rwanda in 1994, Bosnia (and the 1995 Srebrenica massacre), and Cambodia under the 1975-9 Pol Pot regime.

        Israel will have its day to atone for its behavior. They have become what they despise.

    • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Also, even if it wasnt a war of extermination:

      Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons in exchange for protection. Do you think anyone else is going to be dumb enough to do that in the future?

      • qdJzXuisAndVQb2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I am pro-Ukrainian in this conflict, but this is untrue. Point to the specific wording in the accord that supports what you’re saying, if you can.

        • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I’ve never read it directly, just seen this referenced, but I remember seeing something about it in a textbook (or something? That kind of paper), and an anti nuclear friend of the family holding Ukraine up as an example back in like the 90s.