Cross posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/13074556

The country’s parliament recently passed a measure - backed by PM Anthony Albanese - calling for the return of Mr Assange to his native Australia.

The US wants to extradite the 52-year-old from the UK on criminal charges over the leaking of military records.

Mr Assange denies the charges, saying the leaks were an act of journalism.

The president was asked about Australia’s request on Wednesday and said: “We’re considering it.”

  • jarfil@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 months ago

    He published information that “could aid the enemy” and “damage own personnel”. According to the military, that’s a crime, even if (or moreso if) it’s done by revealing war crimes committed by the military itself.

    He also published, and was about to publish more, compromising information about a bunch of other people who have lobbying influence over the US government.

    And he has got multiple awards… just not from the people he’s pissed off 🙂

      • jarfil@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Every country’s law applies to whatever happens on its soil and it’s interests abroad.

        Whether it can be enforced, is a matter of extradition treaties… or black ops.

      • Banzai51
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        He published STOLEN documents. If you want to participate in Civil Disobedience, you have to accept the consequences. He’s not in it for any cause other than fuck you.

        • ebc@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          By that same logic, can Russia ask Japan to extradite a US citizen because they advocated for LGBTQ+ rights while they were in South Korea? Because that’s basically what’s happening here, I just swapped the offence and the countries involved.

          Dude isn’t a US person, wasn’t in the US when he committed the alleged crime, and said alleged crime isn’t a crime where he allegedly committed it. US law isn’t world law.

          EVEN IF the guy might’ve been rapist asshole (allegations were fishy as heck), this extradition proceeding is a gross overreach by the US, and the UK should have laughed it out of court. If a country has any leg to stand on regarding extradition, it’s Sweden (I think that’s where he was when he committed all the alleged crimes, both the sexual ones and the wikileaks ones).

          • Banzai51
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            They can ask, but no one is under obligation to comply, just like the US asked and were rejected. If I personally published stolen classified material that would embarrass or materially harm a foreign nation, I would expect retaliation of some sort.