Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 8 months agoCovid was awesome. I got to spend more time in the basementlemmy.worldimagemessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up1413arrow-down18
arrow-up1405arrow-down1imageCovid was awesome. I got to spend more time in the basementlemmy.worldUltragigagigantic@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 8 months agomessage-square21fedilink
minus-squarelowleveldata@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·8 months agoWhy not just say “No Mask No Entry”?
minus-squareJCreazylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·8 months agoPeople might start wearing other types of masks and they would be unacceptable.
minus-squaresnooggumslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·8 months agoOk, but this literally says no face which is more confusing.
minus-squareSentient Loom@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·8 months agoYeah there’s no defending that poor communication.
minus-squareViking_Hippie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·edit-28 months agoAll of them would be worn on the face, though. Come to think of it, “face mask” is just “foot shoe” at a higher elevation 🤔
minus-squareidiomaddict@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 months agoI think it’s different from, say a ski mask, which covers the whole head, vs only the face. Though surgical masks only cover part of it, so it’s still not very clear
Why not just say “No Mask No Entry”?
People might start wearing other types of masks and they would be unacceptable.
Ok, but this literally says no face which is more confusing.
I just assume someone forgot to a word.
Yeah there’s no defending that poor communication.
All of them would be worn on the face, though. Come to think of it, “face mask” is just “foot shoe” at a higher elevation 🤔
I think it’s different from, say a ski mask, which covers the whole head, vs only the face. Though surgical masks only cover part of it, so it’s still not very clear