• Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    What’s with the downvotes? Giving impoverished parents money for their children is not a bad thing.

    • techwooded@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s the same stuff with all these programs that have the trapezoid structure (income phase-ins). What the designers of the program are really looking to do is to not spend a lot of money, so the phase-ins move a large group of people (or children) from just below the line to just above the line so everyone can pat their back, they’re not actually interested in

      Also actually having evidence that people just want to take care of children breaks the “moral hazard” narrative down which people don’t like

    • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      There are people who will poo poo anything that smells like the government doing anything for the less fortunate that may cost the more fortunate a few cents each.

  • Granbo's Holy Hotrod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    8 months ago

    Most poor people I know bust their ass more than most of the well to do people that I know. They make bad money choices or are hit by life and just can’t get out from under it.

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 months ago

    We should probably do more studies on this to confirm the findings of 10,001 previous studies, the lived experiences and testimonials of previously poor people, and the basic morality that guides our decisions.