Is there any reason, beyond corporate greed, for SMS messages to cost so much?

If I get it right, an SMS message is just a short string of data, no different from a message we send in a messenger. If so, then what makes them so expensive? If we’d take Internet plans and consider how much data an SMS takes, we should pay tiny fraction of a cent for each message; why doesn’t that happen?

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    171
    ·
    7 months ago

    its crazier than you think… the original sms messaging was sent over an already existent, in process data path… they didnt really have to add much to the system to accommodate it, yet charged an obscene amount per message

    the answer is simple; because they can

    • AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      75
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Messages went from $.05, to $.10, to $.20 to send and receive. That was in the span of three years. All of the companies said it wasn’t collision. They just happened to arrive upon massive increases separately.

      If I recall, one of the CEOs said “We’re raising the prices to save customers money. This way they’ll be an unlimited plan”

      The telcos should have been broken up then. Instead we’ve seen even more mergers.

      • Edit: forgot to include the years. This was in the U.S. circa 2005-2008. Telcos have moved onto other sleezy practices now.*
        • skulblaka@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          You could ignore them and not recieve. But then you’ve got a billion pending messages that you don’t know the content of.

          • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            The messages weren’t pushed to you? You got a notification and then had to request the actual message? That would be even more stupid, as it’s using twice the bandwidth.

            • skulblaka@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              That’s how it worked on my old phone, you got a message notification but it cost you to actually read it. No clue if they sent the message content before the paywall or if it pulled it down afterward.

              But it also meant you could use your phone basically as a beeper without paying for texts. Just see who sent you a message, ignore the actual message and call them.

        • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          This was certainly in the US at one point. I remember having 500 per month, which was an absolute joke for 16 year old me with a girlfriend the next town over, and paying 25 send and 5 receive afterwards. Old cell plans were absolute trash.

          • Maeve@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Jesus. I remember my first cell was $35/month, 350 minutes of talk, no data and unlimited texts, before smart phones. On contact.

            • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Yeah, I remember when they started rolling out data plans and they were hefty and the Internet on phones was useless. Then GPS on your phone was an add-on, also hefty. So it’s definitely improved.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Probably trying to get the last juice to squeeze as more and more traffic moves to web based messaging