• seahorse [Ohio]OPMA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    7 months ago

    There is zero proof of that. You would call MLK a main character?

    • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Perfect example. “The arc of the moral universe is long but it bends toward justice.”

      After more than a decade of activism, MLK didn’t live to see the passage of the Civil Rights Act. And that law didn’t solve the problem of racial inequality.

      If you were alive in MLK’s time, you would be complaining that he hadn’t done enough.

      • seahorse [Ohio]OPMA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Still wouldn’t have happened without direct action, which is ultimately what I’m trying to get at in these comments. People like MLK had to put their asses on the line to make change happen. Had to rally support. Simply voting doesn’t really accomplish much. It took Black Americans getting beat in the streets, causing issues for politicians to get the civil rights act past the finish line. You’re right that it does take time for progress to happen but without direct action like what MLK did I don’t think anything would have ever gotten accomplished.

        • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Sure, I agree that it takes more than voting to make change. My point is that change appears incremental when it is actually happening. Only in retrospect, after many small changes have accumulated, can you see a major shift.