• trafguy
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If we end up triggering a self-sustaining feedback loop, that’s how I understand it, yeah. We still do have some very high risk strategies we could implement, like solar shielding to reduce total light reaching the earth, or bioengineering plants that suck up carbon super efficiently, but it’s hard to say what the impacts of those would be

    • toxic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t see either of those happening because there’s no short-term profit. Also, unintended consequences.

    • Lev_Astov@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wouldn’t consider solar shielding high risk, since it would be easy to design fail-safe, but I totally wouldn’t trust bioengineering methods, since life uhh… finds a way.