They only make unhoused people look sympathetic when they want to use them as weapons against people they hate even more than poor people. Any other time they’re just freeloaders too lazy or drunk to get a job.
They only make
unhousedpeople look sympathetic when they want to use them as weapons against people they hate even more thanpoorthose people. Any other time they’re just freeloaders too lazy or drunk to get a job.Fixed it!
“We should take care of our own people before helping other abroad,” says guy who would gouge out his children’s eyes before doing anything to help a single unhoused person
Meanwhile, here in the real world, conservatives are fighting to make it illegal for that unhoused man to sleep.
you think there is problem in society? have you considered that actually there is other problem in society? Czechmate, liberalsConservatives only seem to show any concern for Homeless when they can be used as a bludgeon against some other cause.
Boy, I am sure they are totally genuine here.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/22/us/supreme-court-homeless-case-oregon.html
“The conservative majority appeared sympathetic to arguments by the city of Grants Pass, Ore., that homelessness is a complicated issue best handled by local lawmakers and communities, not judges. The liberal justices strongly resisted that notion.”
They can’t even wait a little bit between disingenuous shifts in their rhetoric.
They always actively contradict themselves.
To be fair, Democrats aren’t much better these days.
It’s all lies and contradicting themselves in a contorted dance to get more money.
That’s why 41% of people in American are currently registered as Independent, 28% Republican, and 28% Democrat.
2 partiers are are the massive minority, but Americans are still accepting that our only choices are Red or Blue.
It’s a complete systemic failure.
We live in a society
Bottom text
Homeless people can get the tents, the problem is the pigs destroy them
Cool so they’re on board with doing something about housing right? Rent control, blocking companies like Blackrock from scooping up all the housing in the country, shit like that?
This funny because libs also hate and want to eradicate homeless peopleAverage Boomer: no thoughts, just vibes and being angry at people younger than you
Out of context this could be a lefty meme criticizing (society’s allowance of) homelessness and not the protests.
In context, I know they’re just being used as a cudgel and the author doesn’t really care.
I don’t even get the point they’re trying to make
Make a second panel where the student has invited the unhoused person into their tent, attempted message entirely undercut in one fell swoop.
They are saying that while homelessness exists, no protests to save people from a genocide are valid. Homelessness should be solved at hone before any aid abroad.
The point is to say that if those protesting really cared, they would volunteer for the homeless or give them tents rather than protest themselves in tents.
Its a false equivalence to undermine them.
Using the homeless to kick down on refugees is fine, but actually giving the homeless a home? Nah, fuck them.
Then those that want to protect the capital will destroy the homeless camp made up from donated tents.
I don’t understand what’s this supposed to mean or if it’s supposed to be funny but I also don’t care so 🤷♀️
It’s just mashing concepts together
