I know what the Creative Commons is but not this new thing or why it keeps popping up in comments on Lemmy

  • Deestan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    If they even notice it, they will say that the website TOS is the relevant license.

    Eirher way, they will just go ahead and use it. None of us have the resources or perseverance to prove anything and take them to court in a meaningful way.

    • explore_broaden
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      What is the website ToS for different Lemmy instances, and does it really permit commercial use in AI?

      • Deestan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        As far as I can tell, they don’t prohibit it. Couldn’t find any mention of it in Lemmy.world TOS

        • explore_broaden
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yes but the default state is that you have copyright over your posts/comments, and by sending them to your Lemmy server you are giving them some license to at least distribute the content to others (most services specify what license you are giving them in the ToS, which is where they would say that you are licensing them to sell you shit to AI companies). In theory by specifying the CC-SA-NC license or whatever that should be the license unless your Lemmy instance has some ToS terms that specifically say you’re granting additional privileges to someone by posting.

          Whether AI companies actually care (they don’t) is a different story, but if eventually they actually have to follow copyright laws like everyone else then it could matter.

      • Deestan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        It says nothing, so you have copyright on it.

        Adding a restrictive license to it only means as much as you’re willing and able to police it yourself and take others to court and argue that they can not assume the same freedom of use of your comments that they can with the rest of the site.

        As an individual, for comments of two sentences each, this is not an option.

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          As an individual, for comments of two sentences each, this is not an option.

          My content is usually more than a sentence or two.

          Also, it puts a stake in the ground for any future enforcement done by others than myself if laws change.

          Its a low-hanging-fruit way of protecting my content. If it works, great, and if it doesn’t, then I’ll vote for someone else for Congress the next time.

          I’ve wasted more time replying on this single conversation/post than I have copy/pasting the link in all of my comments so far.

          Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

          • Deestan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Appreciate your thoughts and responses!

            Though we disagree on the effectiveness, I am all in favour of what you are pushing towards.