• saigot@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well apparently it’s programmed to bypass the safety system after 3 attempts under the assumption that the user knows best.

      This seems like a really dumb choice, but I can see why an engineer would want to point out that it’s not incompetent engineering but an incompetent business department.

      • Miaou@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        If you’re implementing it, it’s your responsibility, end of story.

        • OrekiWoof@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          if you don’t implement it, it will get implemented by someone else anyway and you’re putting your job at risk

          • Miaou@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            That’s called accountability and that’s why engineers get paid extra. Ethic classes are not the part of engineering degrees in the USA very obviously, I shouldn’t be surprised

            • ShepherdPie
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              How can you talk about personal responsibility while blaming engineers for the fact that this guy intentionally closed his finger in a car door?

                • ShepherdPie
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I did read it and I’m also reading it in the context of the article and the rabid group-think here claiming that a potential injury after closing your hand in a door four times in a row is somehow the companies fault or the fault of the engineering department.

                  • Miaou@jlai.lu
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    If you think disabling or weakening safety features after multiple attempts is OK, there is nothing left to discuss with you on this topic.