• Kraiden@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Net neutrality is the status quo, it’s not trying to “solve” anything

        • Kraiden@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          6 months ago

          To. Protect. It.

          You really have no idea what you’re talking about, do you?

        • GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          Because companies like to make money by breaking the status quo when there aren’t any rules.

          It’s the thing they like to do most honestly, and why we need to make rules when we see open loopholes

    • ShepherdPie
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Then it shouldn’t be an issue to implement it then right?

      • xenspidey@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        6 months ago

        But there’s never been an issue… Should Netflix pay more for their increased traffic… Yes, it’s not equal to my browsing.

        • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          6 months ago

          This is totally missing the point. What happened is the equivalent of the bus company calling the supermarket and saying “hey, I’ve noticed a lot of people going to your store. If you want to keep that, you’ve got to pay extra so I don’t drop half the busses from your route”