• Wrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    You’re allowed to say it, we will just downvote another brain dead violent revolution argument. History is full of proof on how well that tends to work out for your average citizen.

    • Kedly@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      Lmao, they deleted their comment, so in the end THEY were the one who decided they werent allowed to say whatever they said

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      History is full of proof on how well that tends to work out for your average citizen.

      Didn’t see what the deleted comment said so I’m not going to defend or attack it. But isn’t that exactly how the US came about?

      • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        And look where that got us. /s

        Jokes aside, the US Independence Movement was an organized restructuring of government into democracy that could have gone by peacefully if the then British Monarchy didn’t try to control them by means of force. The USA didn’t invade the UK and tear down parliament.

          • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yeah, but a better example would be if Texas seceded and see where they end up.

            The deeper nuance here is that the relationship between state and federal, and between colony and homeland, is one of give and take. The British colonies started thinking “taxation without representation is theft” because they were giving and not getting much back. Nowadays, we pay taxes and in return we get representation, subsidized goods and services, a social security net, mandatory civil rights, and military protection. If we don’t like how this budget is established, our votes elect people who decide that budget directly and annually.

              • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                You say all that, but the GOP haven’t exactly been pushing rockstar career politician candidates. The barriers for entry seem pretty low, imo.

                We could easily get campaign finance reform passed if we voted in like a dozen more people from the party who supports campaign finance reform as a partisan issue, but people don’t vote for that. It’s not that votes don’t matter, it’s that people are wasting them.

                  • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    7 months ago

                    The prime examples of inexperienced or underqualified candidates like Joe O’Dea, MTG, Tiffaney Smiley, and Madison Cawthorn just happened to be GOP. Hell, the Trump appointed Secretary of Education literally bought her way into the position, and several Trump appointed judges had little to no experience in court rooms. I’m sure there are a few examples of DNC underqualified politicians, but the divide for Graduate Degrees in the 118th congress is D 73% and R 55%. This is a post about US Politics. It is a 2 party system. Even if you vote independent for congress, that Independent will choose which side to caucus with.