• Jojo-Mcfrost572@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why not think clever. Start mandating water preservation. Stop using drinking water to flush toilets. Involve grey water and maybe use a solar panel dehumidifier system to pull water out of thin air.

    I think having more shrubs and more native plants would be beneficial

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m surprised they took that long. A lot of cities have required that earlier unless you use reclaimated water.

  • Kalcifer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Why ban natural grass? Would putting people on a water meter not accomplish the same thing? Being on a water meter would, theoretically, reduce waste, but at the same time allows one to maintain some of their liberty.

    • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There’s plenty of more wealthy folk that would gladly foot the bill to keep their lawns, probably enough to where it would still be a problem.

      I’m all for personal liberty, but having a grass lawn out in the desert just isn’t viable with our current climate and water rights issues, and honestly was never a good idea to begin with.

      A water shortage effects everyone, so at that point, since their liberty to have a lawn would effect the surrounding area negatively, it probably shouldn’t be protected. Personal liberties stop where they tread on another person’s liberties.

      And besides, there’s plenty of native plants that thrive without watering and look rad as hell, so it’s not like it’s actually going to effect the lawn owner in some deeply harmful way to get rid of their grass.

      If you think about it, it’s not too different from laws banning planting invasive species (which technically reduces your liberty), except instead of it being because it’s invasive, its to prevent a different problem that’s just as significant.