• SloppySol@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        You can, though, if you can forget hard enough. Forgo the meanings that scream, listen to the pain that hurts. Breathe, and listen past the mask your guts hold against you.

        They gave up, so you gave up, but we are warriors. We strive against unity inherently, but love strives against us. Back and forth and back and forth we go, but zero is foam. The concept of one is just a measure of reality.

        Let go of asking why you are, and hear what it is that you ARE. That’s the only way to understand, is to let GO of what you accept. There is no truth, only compromise.

        We must find balance.

        In other words… “waaaah. I’m a crybaby.”

  • TraschcanOfIdeology [they/them, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    My mom literally said this after listening to me rant for almost 20 minutes about how France fucked Haiti with reparations payments and how the Belgian Congo was literal hell to live in in the middle of a bookstore.

    She’s (understandably) concerned about me, the current events are compounding on a mental health crisis I had beforehand, but it’s not like I can unlearn this shit, or stop caring about what’s fucked in the world.

  • If this is true I think it’s a bathtub curve

    But I’m not even convinced it’s necessarily true, at least with regard to generalized well-being (not acute emotional reactions to specific experiences). As far as physiological determinants of well-being, those are universal. I work with people with disabilities, and people that have mental/learning disabilities deal with the same variables that other people do: exercise, diet, sleep, socialization, medication, etc, which contribute massively to general happiness. And many of these people have fewer facilities and resources than other people to get their needs met.

    On a philosophical level, intelligence and/or knowledge about the world doesn’t inherently necessitate unhappiness in the general sense of the word. A negative outlook implies the existence of expectations that the world failed to meet, but the expectations are arbitrary, and thus is the value judgment that follows.

    Learning more about the world should add complexity to our expectations. A binary value judgement resulting in philosophical pessimism is an active choice (albeit interconnected with or superstructural to the aforementioned physiological determinants) that refuses to engage with reality in all its complexity, a dialectical stagnation. Unrefined expectations about an idyllic world that never existed.

    And I think ignorance is bliss only temporarily or only for a statistically small subsection of people who have their physiological needs met and can use escapism to ignore the suffering of others (or who materially benefit from said suffering). Righteous fury is just as viable a reaction to suffering. Revolutionary suicide or revolutionary nihilism at the very least.

    Again, not to disregard acute reactions to specific events, I’m talking about one’s choice of philosophical outlook.