I always learned “ROYGBIV” as the colors of the rainbow. Red, orange, yellow, blue, indigo, violet.

What’s up with the last two? Isn’t indigo basically just dark blue? Why is it violet and not purple? Can’t it just be “ROYGBP”?

  • TootSweet@latte.isnot.coffee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Actually, the answer turns out to be pretty interesting.

    The short version is that what colors are considered “distinct” are heavily influenced by culture and Newton, from whom we get ROYGBIV, came from a culture which valued the dye called “indego.”

    Edit: It also seems Newton thought the number 7 had cosmic significance and thought there ought to be 7 colors.

    More info in this short video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bf7WT6TLy8s

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It doesn’t contain pink or brown. Some of the colours we see are how we register a mixture of light frequencies, whereas each point in the rainbow is just a single frequency.

      • Rexelpitlum@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        What a phantastic thread!

        We have had linguistics, sociology, physics and now biology in the form of colour perception so far.

        Cross domain discussions are great! :-)

      • Dr Cog@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is incredibly incorrect. While many colors that are additive are combinations, those combinations are simply approximations of the single wavelength true color. All colors are on a spectrum of hue, luminance (brightness) and intensity (saturation).

        Pink is red with high luminance and high intensity, and brown is orange with low luminance and mid-high intensity

        • TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nope. A whole bunch of colors do not correspond to any wavelength of light. This includes purple.

          Among some of the colors that are not spectral colors are:

          Grayscale (achromatic) colors, such as white, gray, and black. Any color obtained by mixing a gray-scale color and another color (either spectral or not), such as pink (a mixture of a reddish color and white), or brown (a mixture of orange and black or gray). Violet-red colors, which in color theory include line of purples colors (such as, approximately, magenta and rose), and other variations of purple and red. Impossible colors, which cannot be seen under normal viewing of light, such as over-saturated colors or colors that are seemingly brighter than white. Metallic colors which reflect light by effect.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectral_color#Extra-spectral_colors

    • Dewbs84@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well yes, but the differentiation of colors varies by, believe it or not, culture! For example, the Japanese word for blue, 青 (ao) was used both (depending on context) for what we would call blue and green, and it wasn’t until modern times that a new word, 緑 (midori) started being used to explicitly define what we might call green. Even now, their ‘green’ traffic lights would be described as blue in other cultures. My apologies for the euro-centric over-simplification, but here’s a great article to elaborate further: https://cotoacademy.com/japanese-color-blue-green-aoi-midori-青い-みどり/

    • DrQuint@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Actually…

      There is no purple light.

      Kinda.

      Video explaining it in detail: https://youtu.be/CoLQF3cfxv0

      Several colors we can perceive only exist as a specific mixture of wavelengths. And purple (coincidentally for this thread) is one such - white light contains it, sure, but, you can’t isolate it to a specific single band, like you can isolate cyan or yellow. So, no, rainbows can not have purple in them.

      • FiskFisk33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I disagree. That color he keeps talking about is magenta, there is no magenta light. I see purple in the rainbow, but not magenta.

        • Dr Cog@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You would be half correct. Magenta is impossible “in the real world”. It obviously exists on your computer screen due to its ability to shoot colored light into your eyeballs

    • mookulator@wirebase.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well yeah. I guess my question should be “why do we learn indigo and violet when we learn about the rainbow”. It’s more cultural

      • Rexelpitlum@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, exactly.

        E.g. in Germany I don’t have heard anyone using Indigo and Purpur as major colours but only in combination with blue : “Purpurblau” and “Indigoblau” describing certain forms of blue.

        So only blue and violet in german rainbows. And ultraviolet because most of us are more engineer than poet nowadays ;-)

  • lefixxx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because purple is a combination of wavelengths and the rainbow has only has the single wavelengths. It also missing “lighter” colors like pink and “darker” like brown

    • Dr Cog@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      ???

      Purple is not a combination of wavelengths, it is a single one. And pink and brown are lighter/darker versions of other colors. Pink being light red, and brown being dark orange.

      • KaJashey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Depends on how you define purple. If violet is close enough to purple for you then that “purple” would be a single spectral color, a single or continuous set of wavelengths. If it’s just a little more like magenta it would be a non-spectral color. A combo of red and blue light.

        Plenty of non-spectral colors. Most things we see are non-spectral colors. Single pigments give off multiple wavelengths. Most things have combos of pigments on top of that. Emission spectra are multiple wavelengths.

      • beefcat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Purple is often defined as the color we perceive when something reflects blue and red light, whereas violet is a specific region of the light spectrum between blue and ultraviolet.

  • surfrock66@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have been trolling people for years with passionate wat-too-serious arguments that the rainbow is ROY G BAP for blue and purple.

      • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Indigo color is created by mixing more parts of Blue than Red.

        Violet color is created by mixing more parts of Red than Blue.

        Purple is created when two wavelengths are visible at the same time, between Red and Blue. At the same time, Violet colors border on Red, and Indigo colors border on blue.

        Therefore, Purple is a color inbetween Violet and Indigo.