• nomous@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    Interesting, the one who doesn’t want to burn your house down is equal to the person who does want to burn your house down in your mind?

    Neither one wants to do what you want so both are equally bad to you, what a shit take.

    • BakerBagel
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      52
      ·
      1 month ago

      The solution is to remove the danger, or else your house willburn down sooner or later.

      • nomous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s not an option you have right now.

        The choice is between burning it down NOW or not.

        • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          their answer to raging forest fires destroying 1000s of homes each year:

          just put it out bro. it’s so easy, lol.

        • BakerBagel
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 month ago

          You should probably ask yourself why you don’t have the option to actually reduce harm. Republicans jave no problem getting their representatives to do what they want. So why do Democrats struggle so much?

          • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Because the Democrats are the big tent party. Republicans are backed by a bunch of idiots, WASPS, and single issue voters. The Democrats have entire core elements that vary by state and region, from urban progressive whites to rural socially conservative minorities sith both groups only agreeing on economics for example.

            The fact is up until recently the Democrats have had to juggle even more groups that have fallen off, for example in my area there is an Iranian minority that used to back the Democrats but have turned to the Republicans because of LGBTQ issues, because they are a bigoted bunch of weaklings.

            The point is that the Dems have been fighting themselves as much as the Republicans, which has hindered them quite a lot. The reason for the increased effectiveness in recent times is due to some demographics shrinking, disappearing, or otherwise realigning with more of the national average. Also the Republicans got a helluva lot worse.

      • Neato@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        How do we remove the danger? Specifically? Things the average person can do that will actually help.

        • BakerBagel
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          All the average person can do is tell their representatives at the local and federal level what they expect in exchange for their vote. “Vote Blue no matter who” doesntlead to amy actual change unless you leverage your vote for actual policy changes. MAGA is the open admission of what the GOP has been pushing the last few decades actually realized. Republicans who didn’t offer what the base wanted were replaced by people willing to push for that reprehensible agenda. Pressure you representatives to actually protect human rights and replace them if theu won’t do it. The people have actual power, progressives have jist been conditioned to not wield ot since that threatens the power structure in Washington.