This isn’t about immediately filtered content, like the disgusting DuffMan George Floyd meme, or Holocaust denial. That’s pretty well kept in check by mod tools. I’m also not talking about cogent or even pointed political discussion.

I’m not even talking about necessarily in this community directly, however in a lot of other spaces I’ve noticed a lot of accounts using divisive language and terms like “The ineffectual left” “single issue voters” “ignorant right wing morons”. Lots of straw man arguments, lots of willful ignorance.

I’m not a centrist, I’m very very very far left however I know well enough not to patently dismiss the talking points of others, outside of course calls to genocide. I know what dog whistles sound like, and I’m hearing a lot of them lately.

Most egregiously I’m seeing very long form post replies that read very much like what is generated from LLMs.

So I guess my question is, how’re we all fairing with what might be the largest Turing test ever?

  • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    131
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve noticed a huge influx of anti-Biden posts and comments, to the extent that I honestly think we’re finally getting the reddit treatment. I remember there, when the Russian Internet connection went down, and for like a day all those kinds of posts nearly evaporated. And it seems like those accounts don’t just do the overtly political things, they also engage in other areas, usually with a conservative slant.

    • aodhsishaj@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Yeah, that’s a lot of what I’ve been seeing, bad faith actors sowing dissent.

      Edit: ducking autocorrect

    • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      We used to think that if we had user-generated content, we would all be immune to governments, corporations and other powerful actors spreading propaganda because we would get our information from each other, not them.

      Turns out: governments, corporations, other powerful actors are perfectly capable of paying “users” to “generate content” and not even disclose this.

      The Internet used to be an exciting development, now it’s just like, yeah it exists, so what.

      • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I remember, after being on the internet for a while, when the www standard was being adopted and all the web pages started popping up. It was so cool to see the kinds of content people were using it for. Then we got search engines like altavista, and it honestly seemed magical. It was like this egalitarian utopia, where all this knowledge was available to everyone; it was hard not to feel like it was the start of an amazing new phase for society.

        So it was just soul crushing to me when we first started seeing intentional manipulation and misinformation. Search results that were skewed by paid advertisements or google bombing, propaganda being pushed into discussion forums, and all the fake news… it all represented the end of that amazing new phase. Heartbreaking.

        • JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          Oh man when i was young and go to play and explore with my Neopets, downloading things on limewire & chatting on msn messenger after dialling in to the ‘internet’ was magical.

          I should check on my neopets, it’s been… A while.

        • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          I am too young for that, but I do remember discovering the concept of wikis and finding it amazing that websites could now be written by their audience.

          A fairly dead concept by now, nowadays the entire rest of the Internet is more interesting than wikis.

      • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        paying “users”

        And using LLMs, then eventually getting useful idiots involved as well.

    • rustyfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I remember there, when the Russian Internet connection went down, and for like a day all those kinds of posts nearly evaporated.

      Oh shit, I remember this one. For a short time Reddit became a loooooooooot friendlier. Not friendly but friendlier. You could have a nice conversation with someone opposing your views and it came to an actual trade of insights. I valued that a lot. No fucking derailment with stupid ass nonsense and childish jibes. (At least for the most part. Reddit is after all Reddit)

      • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah, for sure. And before that time I used to wonder how much truth there was in the idea of the Russian troll farms - it seemed a bit like a conspiracy theory, even though it was pretty well documented in the Mueller report. But that day was such a dramatic demonstration. The whole site suddenly shifted so much to the left, and the toxicity dropped so much lower.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Ah yes, Mr RustyFish. I see you support Fishell Rustic Sanders for ruler of earth, purely based on his pro-fish stances.

        We may agree in a fish court, or even a basketball court, but at the end of the day, you win some, I win some, and we both smell like fish for having tried your suggestion of chopping up dead fish that washed ashore already dead…and running their guts and bodies all over our hair and bodies.

        Now I fear we’re two naked strangers slathering each other in fish corpses.

    • fishos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Nope, not a bot and anti-Biden registered Dem. You guys always want to Strawman anti-Biden comments as either “angry conservatives” or “Russian-psyops”. You don’t actually address the concerns either, just brush them off as trolls. Discourse on Lemmy is a echo-chambered joke already. It doesn’t need trolls to ruin it, you’ve done plenty well yourselves.

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Meanwhile, our Lord and Savior PugJesus is singlehandedly taking the fight to the trolls.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m just trying to remind them they aren’t welcome in decent places. I wouldn’t go to .ml or worse, Hexbear or grad, if you paid me.

    • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      1 month ago

      Maybe there are people that are outside of America and don’t have direct impact of who wins the election and they don’t have to blindly praise biden. Trump is a piece of shi but acting like criticizing Biden is some kind of a foreign conspiracy is funny.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 month ago

        Criticising him? No.

        Criticising him and going “I’m not gonna vote for genocide Joe”?

        Yes.

        If you were Putin, you’d do everything in your power to see Trump elected. And if you pretend Russian troll factories don’t exist then we know you’re in one.

        • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Just look at my comments downvotes. It really is about people being angry at others criticizing biden.

          I did not mention anything about voting btw just to be clear. I just don’t like the left behaving like the right. People should be free to criticize any leader. Just because orange man can do it worse doesn’t mean you should let biden run around doing anything he wants. We should demand for people’s best interests and well being.

              • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                1 month ago

                The fact that other countries are absolutely trying to influence the US election by criticizing Biden, especially the Kremlin.

                • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Yes a Trump victory is better for enemies of the US.

                  Yes Democrats/Biden are making a lot of dumb moves and doing their damn best to lose.

                • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  It’s me the Russian bot showing up to badmouth dear leader, I gotta be real with you though, nobodies paying me to post on a fucking random ass lemmy instance.

      • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Maybe it’s because we saw this exact fucking shit swing the election in 2016 and a lot of people have no patience for it left.

  • andyburke@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 month ago

    The growing intensity of straw manning over the past decade has hurt us all so much.

    Don’t try to characterize what “they” would do, then get mad at your hypothetical. We need to talk to each other instead of about each other.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    Plenty of “genocide Joe”, lib bashing, “both sides”, implication that if you vote for Biden you’re complicit in genocide, and many other anti-vote and anti-democrat posts all around.

    Not sure what you’re reading that constitutes “dog whistles”, there have been some posts mocking right wing responses and some fediverse self-policing and knee jerk reactions to the female trapped in the forest with either man or bear discussion that have already gone through several evolutions and iterations.

    The mockery of singe issue voters is deserved taken in the context of the failure to vote being trump fascism and even more genocide. Not sure what you’re trying to offer there other than what? We should listen to more open to “genocide Joe” comments and become immobilized with ambivalence and again, let fascism win by inaction?

    Personally, I’m not hearing dog whistles. I’m reading people directly trying to influence opinion to not vote for Biden by any means necessary while willfully and actively avoiding any consequences to a trump win.

    • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m reading people directly trying to influence opinion to not vote for Biden by any means necessary while willfully and actively avoiding any consequences to a trump win

      Exactly, Kremlin shills and trolls using Israel’s genocide as a wedge issue to get their asset into the White House again so he cuts support for Ukraine and pulls out of NATO.

      • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        At this point it’s not just Kremlin shills. Netanyahu very obviously prefers Trump as well. These “leftists” don’t even realize they’ve gone full mossad.

        • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Are you implying there are Israeli government shills on social media using this as a wedge issue? Seems unlikely to me.

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s hilarious seeing them run the exact same “corrupt DNC” playbook when no Dems from 2016 are even in this race. They are doing it because they are lazy, and because there are still enough people who are so bought into this that it still seems to fool a handful of idiots.

    • forensic_potato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      While I do absolutely agree that single issue politics is a real thing like you showed, literally the only reply to your comment was “if you are a single issue voter, you’re an idiot”.

      So I also think OP has a point here and we’re talking more about the people who use the term as an ad hominem attack, which I certainly have seen plenty of. And now Lemmy has provided us with yet another example of people taking something legitimate and turning it into a weakness/attackable offence. Like some trolls and racist people on the right now talk about DEI in negative terms

      • Fair points. I’m guilty of just saying “single issue voters,” without elaborating on every comment. That could easily be seen as an indirect ad-hominem attack. Maybe I should make a copy-pasta response for whenever I see someone arguing for single-issue decision making.

        That said, there are justifiable single-issue decisions. If Trump was spouting rhetoric about shutting down all support of Israel, yeah. I can stand behind folks “switching sides” over this. Free Choice, ditto. 2A I have a harder time with, but that’s because there are usually so many other issues that you’d think are more important. Not my decision, but I have less sympathy for people who think being able to own a gun is more important than the ability to unionize.

        Anyhoo, like I said: fair points.

    • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      If you’re not going to vote for someone you otherwise would because of a single issue, you’re a single issue voter.

      I thought it was you decided who to vote on based on a single issue. If you care about multiple issues, and any one of them is a deal breaker, then wouldn’t you be a multi-issue voter?

      edit: “can can” -> “care”

      • I thought that’s what I wrote, but if it didn’t come across right, I apologize.

        Single issue voting means how you vote is determined by a single issue. That includes not voting at all because of a single issue. What I meant to say above is that if you would vote for X, but choose to not vote at all because of one issue, you’re a single issue voter. A single issue is deciding your vote.

        As Rush once sang:

        If you choose not to decide You still have made a choice

        • But if you would have also not voted because of issue Y or Z are also dealbreakers, then you’d be a multi-issue voter. If candidate A believes Y and Z, but not X, candidate B believed in X and Y, but not Z, and candidate C that believes in X and Z, but not Y, so you just didn’t vote, it would be clear its 3 different issues that you care about, but for each candidate, it would be a single issue why you aren’t voting for them. Would that just mean you are a single-issue voter for 3 different issues?

          But if candidate A believes in Y and Z, candidate B believes in Z, and candidate C doesn’t believe in any of them in a particular election, in that case X alone would mean not voting for any of them.

          • OK, now a serious response.

            What you are describing, to me, is how people should vote. It’s normal voting behavior. In realty, there are dozens of issues people care about to varying degrees, and you can assign values to each issue (how much it matters to you), add them up, and vote based on that.

            My issue is that single-issue voters assign infinity to one issue and vote based on that, which is both usually lazy and stupid. There are cases where it’s reasonable, but they’re rare; if Trump supported Palestine and Biden supported the genocide (which tells you which side I’m on on that topic), then yeah; I think genocide is a reasonable single issue to make a decision. But in this case, Biden is pro-Israel, and Trump is pro-genocide (he’s said he thinks Israel isn’t going hard enough), so pro-Palestine voters should vote Biden.

            Going back to your example: if two candidates do have the same position on issue X; and candidate A supports Y and Z; and candidate B doesn’t support Y or Z, then even if your single issue is X, you don’t just not vote. You have an opinion about Y and/or Z, so you vote for A or B based on that. And in your specific example, first: there is no candidate C in the US; there hasn’t been since Abraham Lincoln. Voting on the US is fucked up, and a vote for a third party is a wasted vote: not a protest vote, but a wasted vote, b/c C has zero chance of winning, and you’re taking your vote away from one of the other candidates, one of whom is more aligned - even if only slightly - with you values. Second, it would be unusual if you cared about X, Y, and Z equally, so one of those two candidates is going agree with you on one of those topics which is more important to you, and you should vote for them. Or - and this is the real situation in the US - two candidates are very similar about a half dozen issues, but widely differ about another dozen pretty important topics. And although that long tail of issues may not be your triggers, the weight of all those issues should make it clear which guy (and, so far, it’s always a guy) you prefer.

            Biden and Trump agree on Palestine, although it’s clear Trump is the worse choice for Palestinians. They agree on big business. The differ about many other important topics:

            • A woman’s right to choose
            • Supporting Ukraine in its defense against the Russian invasion
            • Universal healthcare
            • Environmental protection
            • Worker’s rights
            • Nepotism in government
            • The peaceful fucking transition between administrations
            • Minority rights
            • Whether black people are humans or not
            • Whether women have the right to not be molested

            and many other “lesser” topics. Saying that you aren’t going to vote because Biden is only less bad about Palestine is making a decision about a single issue, and it is a problem; it’s thoughtless, and lazy.

          • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yes, if you consider more than one issue (X, Y, Z) when deciding who or who not to vote for you are a multi issue voter, if you only consider a single issue (X) when deciding who or who not to vote for, you are a single issue voter. It’s not per candidate, it’s per vote.

  • LemmyBe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s election season, so get used to this. Other countries have learned how to divide us using social media, not to mention the years of experience Fox New and Co. have in doing just that. On top of it, we now have AI generated posts to contend with. It’s not getting better anytime soon…personally, I just ignore any post that sounds like it’s inflammatory (which sadly are almost all political posts, and everything Musk).

  • weariedfae@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yes it has been a stark difference that picked up this month. I was in what used to feel like a chill community and the sheer vitriol of the threads the past week has been really annoying.

  • Pojankolli@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    I think some communities might benefit from a very strict no-politics rule. Because this right wing trolling is ruining lemmy for me.

    • YeetPics@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Like when all the rightoids show up to a discussion and spam image macros of pigs shitting on their own balls?

      Get real, this is a left-centered platform, 98% of the trolls aren’t right wing, not by a country mile.

      • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        The Russians are all over hexbear. Read the rare thread about Ukraine over there and it’s literally the same shit the Russian trolls say.

        These aren’t leftists, they are right wingers (barely) pretending to be leftists.

        • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          Seriously. Remember this when it comes time to vote. Their goal with all of this is to emotionally and mentally exhaust you so you give up before its voting time.

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      1 month ago

      “no politics” is what the right says when you suggest that maybe gay people are people. What you mean is a “no conservatives” rule.

    • Ozone6363@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      1 month ago

      Hilarity.

      “Right wing” for this community is if someone is a capitalist.

      Ya’ll have a super left wing echo chamber that’s freaking out about any dissent.

      This sort of shit is exactly why everyone is a political extremist now. You insert yourselves into communities that only agree with you.

    • aodhsishaj@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      The kind of trolls I’m talking about start a conversation with you, ask you leading questions and pull into a discussion though. Then BAM dog whistles. It’s insidious.

      I’m well aware of the old adage “Don’t feed the Trolls”

      My larger question is how do we deal with the leverage an LLM gives trolls?

      • Hal-5700X@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        The kind of trolls I’m talking about start a conversation with you, ask you leading questions and pull into a discussion though. Then BAM dog whistles. It’s insidious.

        If that happens stop talking to them.

        how do we deal with the leverage an LLM gives trolls?

        Once again, stop talking to them. Let the mods do their job.

        EDIT or you can block them. You have the tools to solve the problem. Use them.

          • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 month ago

            I just add a user note to trolls and then anytime I see them I make sure to let people know not to interact with them

            • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 month ago

              Same. If we want Lemmy and the Fediverse to succeed we all need to do our part to stop propaganda. They spend money to spread misinformation, but there’s no budget for fighting it… just us.

  • uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m seeing very long form post replies that read very much like what is generated from LLMs.

    Oh goodness, as one who has a bad habit of putting responses into essay form, I hope this doesn’t refer to me. I’m not an LLM. Honest!

    Okay, I’m pretty sure I’m human. It’s a damn convincing hallucination.

  • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yes, the hexbears and their .ml ilk have started to use alts to troll the larger forums. Their admins openly admit that their only interest within the fediverse is information warfare.

    Other instance need to be taking this as seriously as they would be taking a nazi instance admin admitting to the same things.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m new to the fediverse, and largely I don’t get it, yet.

      But aren’t the things you’re talking about the type of reasons you’d give to DEfederate from that one instance?

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    I have a comment on my profile where I express some observations about the cyber truck that weren’t expressly negative and it was down voted to hell.

    Maybe not so many trolls, but there’s a lot of pretentiousness.

    • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Just like with Reddit, there are a lot of people who use the downvote button if they just disagree, which isn’t really the intent. So you’re likely to get downvotes for any unpopular subjective opinion.

      • mechoman444@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah I generally agree with that.

        I find that people really put a lot of stock into how much they like or dislike something subjectively rather than looking at it from an objective perspective.

      • XTL@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        But if a post gets tons of downvotes, it’s not necessarily or even often because people don’t like the opinion. It’s usually because it was pure opinion stated as a fact or in hostile language or in unreadable writing or the user was otherwise behaving like an asshole.

  • yyyesss?@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    yes, very much. i’ve been telling my partner it may be time to give up on Lemmy.

    the ones that kill me are the long-form posts that seem to be making one point then pivot in the middle and get confusing. they’re just muddying the waters but people who don’t read past the first sentence or two upvote so they gain traction.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Gish gallop. It’s a common tactic used by authoritarians with no real arguments.

  • Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve had a lot of strawman arguments used against me lol. It’s just the internet, I find